0
There has never been a Roman emperor who was split in two. If you mean the Roman empire, that too, was never split. The terms Western and Eastern regarding the Roman Empire was/is a devise used by historians in their writings so that their readers are able to understand them more clearly. When the western part of the empire fell, the empire continued despite the loss of its western territories. The closest that the empire ever came to being "split" was when Diocletian divided it into four areas with his two Caesars and two Augusti, which were supposed to make the vast Roman territory easier to rule.
What else can I help you with?
Who split the empire into two?
If you are referring to the Roman Empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
Which emperor willed on his life that the Roman empire should be split into two parts?
No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.
When the roman empire fell who were the leaders?
There was a split between two parts of Rome. The Eastern and the Western parts. Thinking about it, there were two emperors when the Roman Empire fell. The emperor for the Eastern part of Rome was Romulus Augustus . And the The emperor for the Western part of Rome was Odoacer.
When did empire split into four sections?
If you are referring to the Roman empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
How did Roman Emperor Diocletian affect the course of roman history?
He divide the empire into two halves and shared his power with a co-emperor.
Is Nero gay the Roman Emperor?
Well I actually know the answer to this question because I know two slaves that were around under his reign. Yes their dead now, kind of, but you just gotta trust me. He wasn't gay exactly. But he defiantly was bi-sexual. Also he was into bestiality, animals / animal skins. He was also into incest, doing many things to his mother.
Why did the Roman Empire split into the Eastern and Western Roman Empire?
The empire was never split into two parts. Eastern Roman Empire and Western Roman Empire are terms which have been coined by historians. The Romans has only one term: Roman Empire. Emperor Diocletian created a tetrarchy (rule by four). He was a senior emperor with fellow general Maximian who was his co-emperor. Maximian was senior emperor in the west and Diocletian was senior emperor in the east. Two junior emperors were also appointed. They were subordinate to the senior emperors and took charge of areas of the frontiers which were under the greatest pressure from attacks from outside, the river Rhine in the west and the river Danube in the east. The four units were administrative units of a single empire. Diocletian stressed that the empire was indivisible. The arrangement was designed to improve the defence of the vast frontiers of the empire which were constantly attacked.
How many parts did the roman empire split into before its collapse?
For a while 4 under the tetrarchy (293-313) instituted by emperor Diocletian. Then two when Theodosius created the empires of the west and the east.
Who is the empror that divide romen empire into two?
There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.
Who split the roman empire into two parts in ad 330?
Constantine split the Roman Empire into the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. It should be noted however that the emperor Diocletian (284-305 AD ) made this easier as he was the first to divide the empire into two parts, a western and eastern empire to be ruled separately. The emperors who followed Constantine, Julian and Theodosius I, made permanent the division of the Roman Empire into an eastern and western half.
Why did the split in the Roman Catholic church stay permanent?
If you are talking about the split when the Eastern Rites split into two with half remaining with the Church, and half forming the Orthodox Churches, I don't think it is permanent, just very long lasting.
How did the emperor affect the course of roman history?
He divide the empire into two halves and shared his power with a co-emperor.
