Want this question answered?
Is the identification and continued safe possession of physical evidence from the moment it has been found to when it is accepted as evidence in court.
There is no solid evidence of a second gunman.
Simple answer is there is NONE. No believable or good quality evidence has been produced to prove that Nessy does or does not exist.
When you insure a statement is true with no physical evidence to prove it, an allness claim has been made.
In Nebraska, the duration of such possession is ten (10) years. Nebraska Code §25-202. One who claims title by adverse possession must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she has been in actual, continuous, exclusive, notorious, and adverse possession under a claim of ownership for the full 10-year period mandated by this section. A claim in the nature of a life estate is not a "claim of ownership" within the meaning of the adverse possession doctrine. Lewis v. Poduska, 240 Neb. 312, 481 N.W.2d 898 (1992).
There are several conditions which must be met to prove adverse possession in Mississippi. Those conditions are that it is a rightful claim, that the possession is actual or hostile, that the possession has been exclusive, that possession is open and visible, it must be an uninterrupted period of ten years or more, and the possession must have been peaceful.
In Nebraska, the duration of such possession is ten (10) years. Nebraska Code §25-202. One who claims title by adverse possession must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she has been in actual, continuous, exclusive, notorious, and adverse possession under a claim of ownership for the full 10-year period mandated by this section. A claim in the nature of a life estate is not a "claim of ownership" within the meaning of the adverse possession doctrine. Lewis v. Poduska, 240 Neb. 312, 481 N.W.2d 898 (1992).
People have been convicted without proper evidence. The accusation should be investigated; perhaps you did have a gun and fear a conviction based solely on her testimony. I don't know how to prove a negative (that you did not have a gun), but if you did there are other ways to show it besides her say so; other people saw it, there is other evidence of a gun in your possession like bullets or a gun box. This is why you need a lawyer.
Montag could not prove that books were worth preserving and that society was better off with them.
Despite several sets of investigations, no credible evidence has ever been produced to definitive prove that there was a conspiracy.
There has not been any evidence to prove that the produce from this website is harmful to eat. It is specially packaged to ensure the highest quality.
Because human can be confused. it might have been a bear but they thought it was Bigfoot.