Want this question answered?
Because we all know you're looking at Mrs. Lofgren's quiz paper: It's a) Kansas. You little rascal. ;P
The Battle of Antietam.
Not battle, but a debate. The Missouri Compromise of 1820.
Missouri Compromise
It because he hate on white
Because we all know you're looking at Mrs. Lofgren's quiz paper: It's a) Kansas. You little rascal. ;P
The Crittenden Compromise wasn't a battle. It was a last-minute attempt to avoid civil war. Lincoln rejected it because it would have allowed some extension of slavery.
"Bleeding Kansas" was named the "Pre-Civil War" between pro-slavery and anti-slavery people
The south was losing the battle over slavery in the election of 1860. The Republican Party platform promised not to interfere with slavery in the states, but opposed the further extension of slavery into the U.S. territories. Southern states wanted popular sovereignty giving the power to determine the legality of slavery to the inhabitants of the territory seeking statehood, rather than to Congress.
slavery was the most basic differences between the north and south and they did not like the fact that people wanted slavery and some people didn't. another difference was everyone wanted to have all the forts so the decided to battle and see who should win Fort Sumter and when the battle was over the North won Fort Sumter even though Fort Sumter battle and Fort Sumter is in the south.
The Battle of Antietam.
A slavery battle that was also called the Massachusetts massacer
Because of slavery
no
yes
Not battle, but a debate. The Missouri Compromise of 1820.
my niggr