Want this question answered?
(in the US) The prosecution presents its case first.
fingerprinting was first used in 1988 when the DNA fingerprint was first entered into court!
First they ask the judge , then they just present it!
An appellate court is not a court of first record. If the first court is a court of record then the appeal is usually over a question of law and the appeals court rules only based on the review of the transcript of the lower court. IF the first court is not a court of record then an appellate court can order a new trial to heard in their venue and it would rule based on everything presented.
The first step in performing an autopsy is to carefully document and examine the external features of the body, including any injuries or markings present. This initial external examination helps establish a baseline for further internal examination and provides important information for the autopsy report.
In general, state and federal courts have increasingly accepted DNA evidence as admissible. The first state appellate court decision to uphold the admission of DNA evidence was in 1988 (Andrews v. Florida, 533 So. 2d 841 [Fla. App.]), and the first major federal court decision to uphold its admission occurred in Jakobetz. By the mid-1990s, most states' courts admitted DNA test results into evidence.
the dominion of new england
The first autopsy was performed 400 years ago.
Most likely England, but there is evidence that soldiers played the game in France and Germany.
doctorThe first answer is not true. The answer is a Forensic pathologist.
Absolutely! The man balances the evidence with the truth.
They are doing that because the first autopsy didn't reveal anything and the exact cause of death isn't definite.