To be correct, this should always be referred to as the Crown Court - with capitals - as there is only one for England and Wales, although it sits at various centres around the two countries. Scotland has its own completely separate, and completely different, legal systems, both civil and criminal, and therefore has its own Courts. There is no Crown Court in Scotland.
The Clerk of the Court (more often now referred to as the "Court Manager") reads out the indictments, as charges in the Crown Court are referred to.
Yes. Packaged shandy sold in shops, with an ABV<1.2%, is legally classed as a soft drink so children of any age can buy it.
Shandy sold in pubs cannot be sold to children as it often has a higher ABV.
It varies. Success usually depends on skill and effort.
Being a Stockbroker, I feel qualified to answer this one. A stockbroker can earn any amount of money that he/she wants to earn. Since it is a Commission-Only business, your annual income will depend upon the following:
1. How much effort you put into your work.
2. How good you are at it.
The average stockbroker with a major firm (Merrill, Smith Barney, AG Edwards etc) will earn about $100,000 per year or more. This would be for brokers with 5 or more years of service. There are brokers that earn less and some brokers earn in excess of $500,000 per year.
In the first case, Broderip v Salomon  B 4793, Vaughan Williams J said Mr Broderip's claim was valid. It was undisputed that the 20,000 were fully paid up. He said the company had a right of indemnity against Mr Salomon. He said the signatories of the memorandum were mere dummies, the company was just Mr Salomon in another form, an alias, his agent. Therefore it was entitled to indemnity from the principal. The liquidator amended the counter claim, and an award was made for indemnity.
The Court of Appeal  2 Ch 323 confirmed Vaughan Williams J's decision against Mr Salomon, though on the grounds that Mr. Salomon had abused the privileges of incorporation and limited liability, which Parliament had intended only to confer on "independent bona fide shareholders, who had a mind and will of their own and were not mere puppets". Lindley LJ (an expert on partnership law) held that the company was a trustee for Mr Salomon, and as such was bound to indemnify the company's debts. Lopes LJ and Kay LJ variously described the company as a myth and a fiction and said that the incorporation of the business by Mr Salomon had been a mere scheme to enable him to carry on as before but with limited liability.
House of Lords
The House of Lords unanimously overturned this decision, rejecting the arguments from agency and fraud. They held that there was nothing in the Act about whether the subscribers (i.e. the shareholders) should be independent of the majority shareholder. The company was duly constituted in law and it was not the function of judges to read into the statute limitations they themselves considered expedient. Lord Halsbury LC stated that the statute "enacts nothing as to the extent or degree of interest which may be held by each of the seven [shareholders] or as to the proportion of interest or influence possessed by one or the majority over the others."
Lord Halsbury remarked that - even if he were to accept the proposition that judges were at liberty to insert words to manifest the intention they wished to impute to the Legislature - he was unable to discover what affirmative proposition the Court of Appeal's logic suggested. He considered that identifying such an affirmative proposition represented an "insuperable difficulty" for anyone putting forward the argument propounded by the Lords Justices of Appeal.
Lord Herschell noted the potentially "far reaching" implications of the Court of Appeal's logic and that in recent years many companies had been set up in which one or more of the seven shareholders were "disinterested persons" who did not wield any influence over the management of the company. Anyone dealing with such a company was aware of its nature as such, and could by consulting the register of shareholders become aware of the breakdown of share ownership among the shareholders.
Lord Macnaghten asked what was wrong with Mr. Salomon taking advantage of the provisions set out in the statute, as he was perfectly legitimately entitled to do. It was not the function of judges to read limitations into a statute on the basis of their own personal view that, if the laws of the land allowed such a thing, they were "in a most lamentable state", as Malins V-C had stated in an earlier case in point, In Re Baglan Hall Colliery Co., which had likewise been overturned by the House of Lords.
The House held:
"Either the limited company was a legal entity or it was not. If it were, the business belonged to it and not to Mr Salomon. If it was not, there was no person and no thing to be an agent [of] at all; and it is impossible to say at the same time that there is a company and there is not."
The House further noted:
"The company is at law a different person altogether from the subscribers to the Memorandum, and though it may be that after incorporation of the business is precisely the same as it was before and the same persons and managers, and the same hands receive the profits, the company is not in law the agent of the subscribers or trustees for them. Nor are the subscribers or members liable in any shape or form except to the extent and in the manner provided by the act."
On the issue of floating charges, Lord Macnaghten also said this.
"For such a catastrophe as has occurred in this case some would blame the law that allows the creation of a floating charge. But a floating charge is too convenient a form of security to be lightly abolished. I have long thought, and I believe some of your Lordships also think, that the ordinary trade creditors of a trading company ought to have a preferential claim on the assets in liquidation in respect of debts incurred within a certain limited time before the winding-up. But that is not the law at present. Everybody knows that when there is a winding-up debenture holders generally step in and sweep off everything; and a great scandal it is."
The United Kingdom consists of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The United Kingdom has a Constitutional Monarchy and a parliamentary democracy
We do not have a president, the leader of our government is called the Prime Minister. This is because we have a monarchy still in existence here and the queen acts as head of state, however this role is really only ceremonial and the queen has no real power (other than the fact that the army swears allegiance to the throne). The Prime Minister is usually the leader of the party which won the most recent general election. To win an election outright in Britain, your party needs to have more elected M.P.s than all other parties. M.P.s are members of parliament who work to represent the views of a constituency in parliament. There is an election in the U.K. at least once every five years. The Prime Minister can choose to hold an election before the end of his/her term in office.
Unlike in America, there is no limit as to how many terms you can serve as U.K. Prime Minister. All citizens of 18 years and over are entitled to a vote in all election (unless they are in prison). These are always carried out in an appropriate manner so that people will have confidence in the outcome of the election. Our country has had this form of government for about 400 years.
Constitutional monarchy. Parliamentary Democracy.
We (the British) have not always had a democratic form of government, voted for by the people. The concept of Parliament has been a fairly recent idea. The government rules Britain (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland), not just England. The government sits in parliament in London. We do not have a president, the leader of our government is called the Prime Minister. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland also have devolved governments which direct some of their internal affairs.
In Britain there are three main parties, The Conservatives (right wing beliefs), Labour (left wing beliefs) and the Liberal Democrats (a center party). The two parties not in power at any given time attend parliament in opposition to the government and question the actions the government takes. This is to ensure that the government always acts in the interest of the people in a lawful manner.
Our country has had this form of government for about 400 years, however if you look back further than 100 years you will find that not everybody was always entitled to a vote. Indeed full women's suffrage only happened in 1928.
The U.K. has a system of Government that is properly referred to as a 'Constitutional Monarchy' and may also be referred to as a 'Parliamentary Democracy'.
This system of Government is also largely in use throughout the Commonwealth, and exclusively in the Commonwealth Realms. (Canada, New Zealand, Australia, etc). A Constitutional Monarchy (in the Westminster Style) can be broken down in to three parts; The Sovereign, The Upper Chamber/House and the Lower Chamber/House. In the U.K., this refers to Her Majesty The Queen, The House of Lords and The House of Commons. Conversely in Canada, this refers to Her Majesty The Queen, The Senate and The House of Commons.
A Constitutional Monarch has been defined as a King or Queen that Reigns, but does not govern. This is something of a misleading statement as Her Majesty does in fact still retain some FAR reaching Royal Prerogative powers, but these are exercised by members of the government.
Parliamentary Monarchy. The Queen is the head of state, but the Prime Minister and Government run the country. England has no government. The executive decisions regarding England are taken by the UK government.
The riots in Meadowell started because two lads, from the estate were being chased in a stolen car on the coast road heading towards Meadowell, the police rammed the stolen car into a lampost, the car burst into flames killing both of the occupants, and this DID happen.
Contact your state veterinary licensing board. Often they will have a website with a disciplinary action summary that will list all veterinarians who have been disciplined for improper practice, failure to attain continuing education, etc etc.
You can also check with the better business bureau to see if any complaints have been filed against the Veterinarian or their office.
The left side of the road.
Standard single measure is 25ml, however some establishments have move onto a 35ml measure. It should always be openly displayed in the pub/bar as to what measures they use. By law this measure is only applicable to whisky, gin, vodka and rum. But most places will use it for all their 'spirits'.
With a constitutional monarchy the Queen is the head of state and her assent is needed for forming a new government - although this is not of much real impact all Members of Parliament do swear an oath of allegiance to the monarchControl of English Government
The British government is run by the Prime Minister, currently David Cameron. He is head of the administration.
The only right of the Queen in the UK according to the Ministry of Justice, is the right to be consulted. In practice that means the Government is legally free to ignore her advice. The Queen is still held in great respect by the people so the Government has that to consider if her displeasure becomes known.
That last part isn't true. The royal family isn't particularly popular. Furthermore, they are expected to stay away from politics altogether. (Having said that, Prince Charles does make public remarks from time to time, usually in support of organic farming or something similar.)
Control of power can depend on a number of factors. Officially all power stems from the Head of State, the Queen, although her powers are mostly viewed as ceremonial. Since Peel in the 18C the position of Prime Minister has been the most significant one and it is the holder of this role as leader of his party, who is responsible for key appointments and for chairing the Cabinet which meets daily to decide policy. Limits to the power of PM include a small majority in the Commons, which makes him prey to factional influence from his and opposition parties, economic conditions and personality. Since the early 20C the PM must be a member of the Commons and therefore there is also a leader for each party in the second chamber, which is the House of Lords.
At different times and under different circumstances the limits to the power of the PM are also varied. Mrs Thatcher from 1983 had a substantial majority in the Commons and a forceful personality. She was therefore perceived to be very much in control. The previous PM had been James Callaghan who led a minority administration and could not impose his will on a Labour party riven by factional fighting. He is therefore seen to be a weak leader. Other factors can include external politics - Eden's position was fatally weakended by US opposition to the Suez crisis.
In previous decades one constant in Govt was the Civil Service and arguments have been made that true power was vested in this body. Since the 80s this has been eroded by the prevalence of political advisers to such an extent that now this group is identified as a power in itself. From this stems the criticism of Alistair Campbell under Blair and to some extent (because he is not voted into office but ennobled for political reasons) Peter Mandelson.
The government, with David Cameron as Prime Minister.
Theer is no minimum legal age - HOWEVER - a shopkeeper can refuse to sell any of his merchandise to any one !
75 Countries drive on the left. The following is a list of countries of the world whose inhabitants drive on the left-hand side of the road. Most of the drivers of these countries use right-hand-drive vehicles.
2. Antigua and Barbuda
11. Cayman Islands
12. Christmas Island (Australia)
13. Cook Islands
16. East Timor
17. Falkland Islands
20. Guernsey (Channel Islands)
22. Hong Kong
26. Isle of Man
29. Jersey (Channel Islands)
32. Cocos (Keeling) Islands (Australia)
45. New Zealand
47. Norfolk Island (Australia)
49. Papua New Guinea
50. Pitcairn Islands (Britain)
51. Saint Helena
52. Saint Kitts and Nevis
53. Saint Lucia
54. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
57. Solomon Islands
58. South Africa
59. Sri Lanka
64. Tokelau (New Zealand)
66. Trinidad and Tobago
67. Turks and Caicos Islands
70. United Kingdom (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland)
71. Virgin Islands (British)
72. Virgin Islands (US)
75. Samoa (as of September 2009)
Related link has a interactive World Map
There is no time limit upon reporting a crime in the UK. But for some crimes, there is a time limit on whether that crime can be prosecuted in court.
In the UK most crimes can be prosecuted regardless of the length of time that has elapsed since the were committed. This includes, for example, serious violence, robbery, burglary, theft, sexual offences, murder and many other offences.
However, some minor crimes cannot be prosecuted after six months. This includes, for example, violence that does not cause an injury, driving offences, among others. If the crime is racially motivated then the six month limit may be extended to twelve months.
Even though most crimes can be prosecuted 'forever', it is up to each individual police force to decide whether or not to pursue an investigation if considerable time has elapsed. The force might take into account the seriousness of the offence, the motive for the delay in reporting, and whether, given the elapse of time, a successful outcome is likely.
Even if the police do investigate, a court might still say that the prosecution is an abuse of process if it could have been brought at an earlier time ... for example, when memories were fresher and more accurate.
Nevertheless, in very serious cases such as rape and murder, there have been successful prosecutions in the UK in recent years - often due to new evidence being made available by forensic science technology such as DNA.
There are no set punishments or penalties for criminal offenses. The court must consider relevant law, the history of the defendant, and a number of other factors.
See the info below from the U.S. Department of Labor. Although this isn't specific about beginning entry-level positions you can safely assume those are at the low end of the spectrum. ---- In 2002, the median hourly earnings of cement masons and concrete finishers were $14.74. The middle 50 percent earned between $11.52 and $20.02. The top 10 percent earned over $26.02, and the bottom 10 percent earned less than $9.31. In 2002, the median hourly earnings of terrazzo workers and finishers were $13.42. The middle 50 percent earned between $10.46 and $17.72. The top 10 percent earned over $23.70, and the bottom 10 percent earned less than $8.94. Like those of other construction trades workers, earnings of cement masons, concrete finishers, segmental pavers, and terrazzo workers may be reduced on occasion because poor weather and downturns in construction activity limit the amount of time they can work. Cement masons often work overtime, with premium pay, because once concrete has been placed, the job must be completed. Many cement masons, concrete finishers, segmental pavers, and terrazzo workers belong to the Operative Plasterers� and Cement Masons� International Association of the United States and Canada, or to the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers. Some terrazzo workers belong to the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of the United States. Nonunion workers generally have lower wage rates than do union workers. Apprentices usually start at 50 to 60 percent of the rate paid to experienced workers.
edit-The current (2007) starting wage for a bricklayer in Los Angeles in the union is $11.92 an hour and journey top out at $34.07 after a 3.5 year apprenticeship.
I just started one month ago, and currently employed through an agency and I average $11.00 to $13.00 an hour.Answer
Approx. $11 but dont hold me to it. It all depends on the facility which you work and their payrate.
CNA's make very little while providing excellent care for people w/ disabilities. I have never gotten my CNA license but I did take a course that teaches caregivers and CNA's how to find private paying clients which allows me to charge $25-45/hr. It has worked and I am really happy with the result
The average pay of a CNA is recorded to be $35,000 per annum approximately. In the following, we are going to talk about the CNA salary range; sorted out according to factors such as the state and city of employment, type of employer, and experience level.
the first law made in the UK was 1420s or 1400s
Before 1707 the UK did not exist. So the first law that was passed was the Act of union that joined the parliaments of Scotland and England.
best not to do it in the first place ;)
WHAT IF YOUR IN U.S. CAN THE POLICE IN ENGLAND COME IN TO THE
U.S. AND ARREST YOU AND GIVE YOU A PASSPORT SO THEY CAN TAKE
YOU BACK IN THE U.K. TO THERE JAILS.
No. Personal injury proceeds are considered compensation of injuries and losses, it is not a "gain" or "windfall" under the tax codes. Actually, whether personal injury damage awards are taxable depends on what the award is for. If it is to compensate for personal physical injuries or sickness, then it's not taxable (IRC Section 104(a)(2)). Emotional injury that is the result of of physical injury may not be taxable; however emotional injury that is the result of nonphysical injury (for instance, defamation or trespass) is generally taxable. Likewise, lost wages that are the result of physical injury may not be taxable. (See IRS Guidance: Lawsuit Awards and Settlements and Rev. Ruling 85-97.)
The UK has a limited regulated free market economy, somewhere between the US and continental Europe.
Yes it is a crime to open other people's mail in the UK, this in interception of communications which is a criminal offence under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. This also applies to emails, phone calls and text messages.
However, the crime is only committed if the mail is in the course of transmission. Which basically means that if it has already arrived at your address then it is not interception if someone else just opens it.
If the person steals the contents or uses them to commit a fraud (for example) then they may commit other offences.
Some government agencies (such as the police) have the power to open mail even if it is in transmission, but only when authorised by a warrant signed by the Home Secretary who will want to know the reason why.
Customs Officers do not have to have permission, but can only open items entering or exiting the UK.
Sometimes the Post Office will open mail if it has been incorrectly addressed in order to work out where to deliver it or to return it. This is lawful because it is part of the agreement in posting a letter.
the English bill of rights were rights originally madeto lessen the kings control.
gave people rights that noone can take away.
yes he did he was caught with a gun and sent to prison for 2 years.
The Got the right for religious tolerance freedom of the press, freedom of speech and others
Wages change with individual companies and in respective industries as well. There is no answer that would fit your description. Average household income levels would probably be a better answer for you question. Also keep this in mind, companies should pay out most of their gross profits in the form of salaries to their employees, management level executives will receive the most form of compensation. Depending on wether you are public or private, companies also have to justify the payment level to their executives and relate the compensation to some for of performance or merit for level of service to the company.
What is pokediger1s password on roblox?
Asked By Wiki User
What is 103.468 rounded to the nearest liter?
Asked By Wiki User
What is 8 divided by 2(2 plus 2)?
Asked By Wiki User
Where is one most likely to find rocks that have become smooth and rounded?
Asked By Wiki User
Where to get free past llb exam papers?
Asked By Wiki User
What singular difference was there between the English Bill of Rights and the US Bill of Rights?
Asked By Wiki User
Which one do you think had a greater impact on colonial government - the passage of the English bill of rights or the great awakening?
Asked By Wiki User
Does England have a judicial branch?
Asked By Wiki User
Copyright © 2020 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.