Want this question answered?
One weakness was that the President and Vice President were to be the first and second place in electoral votes, meaning that they would likely be of opposite political views instead of working as a team. Another weakness was the reliance on taxing states; there was no mechanism for taxing wealthy people or companies. The Constitution did not specify what would happen if a Vice President died or resigned. And the Bill of Rights was not built into the Constitution from the beginning.
creating the three branches of government
gave more power to the federal government-apex
No - Great Brittain is a Monarchy.
Instead of a written constitution, Great Britain has traditions. When traditions are respected, they work just as well as a written constitution.
The framers ensured that that there was enough ambiguity in the Constitution. This was done to encourage compromise and cooperation about concepts and not get bogged down in specifics.
yes
The Georgia Constitution of 1777 gave too much power to the legislative branch.
it was ambiguity of me to say that
One weakness was that the President and Vice President were to be the first and second place in electoral votes, meaning that they would likely be of opposite political views instead of working as a team. Another weakness was the reliance on taxing states; there was no mechanism for taxing wealthy people or companies. The Constitution did not specify what would happen if a Vice President died or resigned. And the Bill of Rights was not built into the Constitution from the beginning.
creating the three branches of government
SEMANTIC AMBIGUITY This answer is supported on page 50.
Well kinda but it ended up kinda strong with the branches
Well kinda but it ended up kinda strong with the branches
gave more power to the federal government-apex
gave more power to the federal government-apex
The United States declared Independence from Great Britain. I declared freedom from ambiguity.