Nobles and commoners
Nobles and commoners
yes no
the Hanva Incas, Capac Incas, and Caracus
The Incas thought their rulers were related to the sun god and that they never really died so the priests brought the kings mummies to ceremonies.
Yes, the Incas had a complex social structure that included interactions between different classes, such as nobility, commoners, and slaves. They had systems of trade, tribute, and marriage alliances that facilitated interactions among different communities within the empire. Religious ceremonies, festivals, and communal labor projects also served as means for social interactions.
1.The Mayans thought that human sacrifice was necessary to please their gods while the Incas only made offerings of food, animals, etc. 2. The Mayan had a spoken and written language while the Inca only had a spoken language.3. The Inca had a different social structure from the Maya. The Inca divided their people in different classes and the government controlled everything, including the amount of food given to the people. As a result, the Inca had a better social structure then the Mayans. The Mayan had a simple social structure: The king controls everything and what he says goes.
From rulers
It was peasants, who grew the crops.
the social structure was the government
yes Sumer did have social structure
social structure
Here is an example of social structure used in a sentence. The neighborhoods of a city is made up of its social structure.