The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The prospect of freedom was their main incentive. A Roman slave had the option of buying his freedom, as they were allowed savings. However many times the masters would free them as a reward for good and loyal service.
The emperor Caracalla extended Roman citizenship to all the freeborn in the empire in 212 AD.
No it did not. Slaves in antiquity were war captives. After the end of Rome's wars of expansion the supply of slaves dried up.
The slaves within the boundaries of the Roman empire had the same religion as the Roman citizens. Slavery was a social class, and the lowest on the ladder. Therefore, being a social class, they would have been influenced culturally the same way as citizens. Slaves were not citizens, but followed what the citizens did. The religion of the Roman empire was paganism, therefore the slaves were as well pagans. The only exception would be people from distant lands who were captured and forced to be slaves; in Asia Minor there would have been Christians and Jews, and those religions spread to the Roman empire; people of all social standings--from slaves to aristocrats--would have converted. But, basically, what I'm trying to say, is that the slaves themselves did not have their own religion.
The slaves! If it wasn't for them it would have never been built
It was not built is is a country and it has been there since the fall of the roman empire who had used them as slaves.
Service for the Roman Empire meant either service in the army or service in the imeprial bureaucracy.
Slaves
The emperor Caracalla extended Roman citizenship to all the freeborn in the empire in 212 AD.
No, the slaves had a really hard time.
the roman empire started because instead of killing the people they sold them to be slaves
They were slaves and prosecuted.
Freedmen were slaves who were freed by their masters. They did not actually from a social class as such. They were former slaves.
No it did not. Slaves in antiquity were war captives. After the end of Rome's wars of expansion the supply of slaves dried up.
Spartacus died by a Roman senator called Crassus, He crucified Spartacus along with 6000 other slaves. This was to warn slaves not to try and destroy the Roman Empire. Hope this helps :)
Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.
The slaves within the boundaries of the Roman empire had the same religion as the Roman citizens. Slavery was a social class, and the lowest on the ladder. Therefore, being a social class, they would have been influenced culturally the same way as citizens. Slaves were not citizens, but followed what the citizens did. The religion of the Roman empire was paganism, therefore the slaves were as well pagans. The only exception would be people from distant lands who were captured and forced to be slaves; in Asia Minor there would have been Christians and Jews, and those religions spread to the Roman empire; people of all social standings--from slaves to aristocrats--would have converted. But, basically, what I'm trying to say, is that the slaves themselves did not have their own religion.
They were defeated armies drafted as slaves to the Roman Empire.