answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There exists a problem in defining a "battle", for the line between "battle", "siege", and "campaign" is a blurry, fuzzy one.

Indeed, the longer a "battle" goes, the better change is gets called a "siege" or broken up into smaller battles grouped together as a "campaign".

In ancient times, a battle generally could not last more than a couple of days - sufficient supplies were not available, and military strategy didn't encompass the idea of long-term combat. Sieges were generally distinct from battles, in that the siege was usually an occupation around a fixed geographic point, often with little actual combat.

In modern times, industrialization and technology have led us to "continuous combat" - that is, actual, significant fighting occurring throughout the day and night (though, not at the same time in all sections of the conflict), continuing on for weeks or months.

There is no real answer to your question, as it depends on arbitrary lines being drawn between a siege, a campaign, and a battle.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

oh you know. . . only as long as birth

116 years

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

The battle of good versus evil or obedience versus disobedience as detailed in the book of Genesis (commonly refered to as 'the Fall').

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the largest battle ever fought?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp