Towns grow - whether in the middle ages or in the present day - for the simple reason that more people come to live in them, and more industries are located in them (or near them).
It's a symbiotic relationship between employment and housing, balanced by land availability.
In the middle ages, towns inland grew, as well as seaports, because people moved into the towns to produce and sell their crafts, their goods, their skills. They needed places to live, and this is where it gets interesting. Originally, the Lord of the Manorwould have a wall around his castle, and only the members of his household were allowed inside. So people would set up market stalls along the castle walls. Eventually, they began building huts and shelters there, and moved into them. Gradually, this spead out and soon they were building permanent homes outside the castle walls, but still in its general vicinity (mostly for protection, because the various Lords warred on each other and anyone standing in the way was just considered a regrettable casualty - by living close to the castle they were more or less given protection by the standing army of that particular Lord.
In most European towns, the center of the city is located where the old castle used to stand, and the city branches out from there, in almost concentric circles, as the tows around each of the castles grew.
Type your answer here... increasing industrialization
The industrial revolution. Factories and manufactures were located in the large cities, so the workers moved from the rural areas to the cities for jobs, therefore, population increase.
YES
To frighten the English people, which was the main reason for bombing cities.
There were a few factor that challenged the growth of American cities in the middle of the 20th Century. One factor was the automobile. People now could drive to places outside of the main US cities. Thus, manufacturing began to leave major population centers (the big cities ) Also, as transportation costs began to lower, the advantage that the large cities had being close to waterways was cut. In addition, air conditioning made moves by factories to warmer places and employees happen more often. As a result of these factors, most of the largest cities saw a decline in population.
They were encouraged by political machines.
To find jobs is the most common reason for urbanization, and that means: movements to cities
I think that for the business enviourment is the main reason of groth of bombayin 17th century,
The industrial revolution. Factories and manufactures were located in the large cities, so the workers moved from the rural areas to the cities for jobs, therefore, population increase.
YES
True
industrialist and immigrants.
For workers the people didn't have to pay.
To frighten the English people, which was the main reason for bombing cities.
Yes, one of the main reasons people moved to cities during the latter part of the nineteenth century was to find employment in factories and other industrial establishments. The Industrial Revolution led to an increase in urbanization as people sought job opportunities in growing industrial cities. Movement from rural areas to cities also offered the promise of better wages and improved living standards for many.
The industrial age.
The 16th century was a time when religion, specifically Christianity, was a main reason for migration to the Americas. This was largely driven by the desire to spread Christianity and convert indigenous populations in the New World.
There were a few factor that challenged the growth of American cities in the middle of the 20th Century. One factor was the automobile. People now could drive to places outside of the main US cities. Thus, manufacturing began to leave major population centers (the big cities ) Also, as transportation costs began to lower, the advantage that the large cities had being close to waterways was cut. In addition, air conditioning made moves by factories to warmer places and employees happen more often. As a result of these factors, most of the largest cities saw a decline in population.