Want this question answered?
No.
The 1908 Case Of Muller Vs. State Of Orgeon Was Precedent Setting In That The Supreme Court
Ballsack in my mouth!
A "landmark" or a "precedent-setting" case.
He was accused of libel.
Yes, President Andrew Jackson's veto of the bill renewing bank charters is considered a significant precedent. It established the use of presidential veto power to challenge and reject legislation, setting a precedent for future presidents. It also showcased Jackson's determination to dismantle the Second Bank of the United States and his belief in limited government involvement in financial matters.
home
America
Modern Day
Work can be heavy at times meaning the amount to get done is more than usual. Describe how you handled it by setting priorities and working over time as needed.
'Setting a precedent' is similar to saying 'setting the standard'. When a court (with a large jurisdiction) rules a certain away, they set a standard that forces the lower courts to make similar rulings for similar circumstances.
I am not sure how important it was since there were not really very many presidents who would have served a third term even without Washington's precedent. Maybe Jefferson, Madison, Monroe or Theodore Roosevelt would have considered a third term had the precedent not been set against it. Jackson and Wilson might have if they were healthier when their second terms ended.