answersLogoWhite

0

The court decided on a 5-4 vote, that Miranda's trial was unfair because he did not know of his constitutional rights of self inscrimination and the right to a counsel during questioning. After the case, the Supreme Court ruled that all police officers have to "Mirandize" the person being arrested, or state the rights the person has and make sure the person understands them.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who delivered the US Supreme Court's opinion overturning the Miranda v. Arizona Ninth Circuit court decision?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda v. Arizona was appealed to the US Supreme Court from the Supreme Court of Arizona, having been heard exclusively in the Arizona court system. Only one of the three cases consolidated with Miranda, Westover v. United States, was heard in federal court, in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The remaining two cases, Vignera v. New York and California v. Stewart, were heard in their respective state systems.Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the opinion of the Court in Miranda v. Arizona.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


The case that established rights that are read at the time of the arrest was vs Arizona?

Miranda v. Arizona


What are the results of Miranda v Arizona?

5-4 miranda wins


What Warren Court decision determined that people had to be informed of their rights before being questioned by police?

Miranda v. Arizona.


How do you cite US Supreme Court case in Blue Book Miranda v Arizona and in Westlaw?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


Did the Miranda v Arizona established the supremacy clause?

No.


What was the date of Miranda v. Arizona case?

1966


What is the name of the Supreme court case that changed law enforcement across the nation?

Miranda v. Arizona


Who were the parties in the US Supreme Court case Miranda v Arizona?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Ernesto Miranda was the plaintiff; the state of Arizona was the defendant. In a court case, the plaintiff/petitioner's name is always listed first, and the defendant/respondent's name is listed last.


Miranda v Arizona (1966)?

(1966) *Rights of the Accused


Who authored the majority opinion in Miranda vs Arizona?

Earl Warren


Which warren court decision determined that people hat to be informed of their rights before being questioned by the police?

Miranda v. Arizona