Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda vs. Arizona
The supreme court case Miranda vs Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona-suspected criminals must be read their rights
Miranda v. Arizona, (1966).
The U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona is the basis for the procedure of informing suspects of their legal rights during arrest. As a matter of fact, the reading of these rights is commonly called the Miranda Warning.
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) was the landmark Supreme Court case in which the court declared that the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, (which also applies to the states through application of the Fourteenth Amendment) required that before law enforcement officers attempt to interrogate the accused, they inform the accused of their rights. These rights are now referred to as Miranda rights.
They have(if in the Us) all the rights in the United States Constitution. But when someone is under arrest the arresting officer must read the person their Miranda Rights. Miranda rights are what you here on all those TV shows..."you have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to AN ATTORNEY. if you cannot afford an attorney one will be given to you" etc. This was established by Miranda v. Arizona case. and the right to counsel(an attorney) was established by the case; Gideon v. Wainwright.
The constitutional issues at stake in Miranda v. Arizona were the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The case established the requirement for law enforcement to inform suspects of their rights, known as the Miranda rights, before questioning them.
Miranda v Arizona was the case that set the precedent that verbal warnings must be given to a suspect during arrest.
Miranda v.Arizona