Aboriginal
In Re Gault
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona, (1966).
Miranda v. Arizona-suspected criminals must be read their rights
The Miranda Rights are an example of a supreme court precedent, set by a historic case in 1966. Before 1966 there was no national standard for informing a suspect of his rights. After the case, all law enforcement agencies adopted a policy of reading people their Miranda rights.
The case Miranda v. Arizona established the requirement that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have legal counsel present during questioning. This ruling aimed to protect the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. By ensuring that suspects are aware of these rights, the decision helps prevent coercive interrogation practices and upholds the principle of fair legal representation for accused persons. The "Miranda warnings" are now a critical component of law enforcement procedures in the U.S.
"The right to remain silent" is one of the Miranda rights, established by the Supreme Court in 1966.
The Zenger case established freedom of press.
Miranda v Arizona
marbury v. madison
marbury v. madison