No, serfs did not take part in a feudal contract. They were born into their station in life, and there was no need to obtain the promises required for feudalism from wholly free people. The serfs had a measure of freedom, but they were bound to the land legally.
a contract between a peasant and their lord for protection and life in the medieval time
A serf or peasant
Peasant and serf
A peasant.
No, there was no advantage to being a peasant. The feudal system was designed to benefit the upper classes, not the lower. People did not choose to be peasants, they were forced into that role.
work the fields
Peasant
A serf or peasant
A peasant owned no land, so they weren't directly a part of the feudal system. Many peasants worked on lands owned by knights or nobles.
In the 1800's the feudal peasant no longer existed.
upper peasant section
peasant or serf
A villein is a peasant farmer in the feudal era tied to a lord of the manor. There is no believing or not, so there is no word to denote this position in feudal society. A person is a peasant or not.
Serfs
They had to pay 10% of their income or crops
The answer to both questions is in the crisis in feudal society which was the cause of the peasants ' revolt.
the feudal contract
It started when he became king in 1066. The feudal system was with the king at the top then the barons then came the knights then the peasant's.