During the American Civil War, the purpose of the Emancipation Proclamation (announced by President Lincoln on January 1, 1863) was to free all slaves in the secessionist states of the South. While the Proclamation did not abolish slavery as an institution nor free all slaves, it was a vital step in that direction.
Historically proclamations were made by the king of the day. Today in many parts of the world mayors or governors have the authority to make proclamations.
Frederic A. Youngs has written: 'The proclamations of the Tudor Queens' -- subject(s): Great Britain, History, Politics and government, Proclamations
i do not knoe anwer it
Nope
How about "Declarations" or "Proclamations" or "Decrees" or "Transmissions"...
Eh?
There are so many proclamations concerning Jews that this question is meaningless. Typically, the King or Political Leader would put his word and his soldiers to defend the proclamations he uttered or would do no such thing (which would result in paper-rights but not actual rights).
The Liberty Bell is now a historical landmark. It was created to tell people that new laws and statues were being enacted.
It depends upon the country. In the US, they are called decisions, judgments, or opinions.
An official formerly charged with making royal proclamations and bearing messages of state between Kings/Queens.
it made it ok for the Union soldiers to free slaves as they went through the south
If this question pertains to President Lincoln's issuance of his two Emancipation Proclamations then the answer is clear. The final Proclamation freed all slaves in States in rebellion against the Union. It did not address slavery in States loyal to the Union. Lincoln understood that under the US Constitution, he had no power to "free slaves". What he did was what is called an executive order for military purposes. In this manner he was able to issue his Proclamations. The Proclamations were legal in terms of a president doing what he deemed necessary in times of crises.