answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

fear of placing too much power in the hands of the people.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the reason behind the use of an electoral college to select a president?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the second reason that the electoral college was created?

To create a buffer between the population and the selected president.


Does voting really count or just the electoral college?

Honestly,it seems there is no reason to vote for president,since we are not.They should just say we are voting for somewon to vote for us.i mean,if im wrong somewon please correct me.


Who is the US President chosen by?

The US President is chosen by the Electoral College, which is obligated by law to vote according to the results of the popular election in all but two states. The number of Electors for each state is determined by their population as a percentage of the total US population, counted during the last census. For this reason, it is possible for a candidate to win the national popular election, but lose in the electoral college. Electoral members can and HAVE voted for other then the candidate they were sent to support


What was the second reason of why The Electoral College was created?

To create a buffer between the population and the selected president.


Which reason best explains why the Electoral College is controversial?

The controversy can be seen 2 ways. It can been seen in the truth, and in the excuse. The excuse is that the electoral collage is not one vote is one vote. It is a complicated process where you instead of electing the president, you are electing electors who vote for the president. But the truth is simple. When creating the electoral collage, the founding fathers knew that if they created a popular vote to elect a president, big states (like NY and CA today) would dominate the election. All of the candidates would go there, and nobody else mattered. This system was created so that small states can actually play a impact in elections.


What was the constitutional institution for choosing presidents that came under severe criticism after the 2000 popular vote winner failed to win the office?

The electoral college elects the president, not the direct popular vote. There is a reason for this, but Gore supporters were disappointed when their man was not elected president after carrying the popular vote.


Why do people vote if election is based on electoral votes?

The reason why people vote for the president even though it is based on an electoral college is because if you are voting for a slate of people which vote for the president, it is still important! It is even more important if you are in a battleground state because then your vote could help decide the election! (example: Albert Gore Jr. vs. George W. Bush; 300 votes in Florida could have changed the outcome of the election!)


How can a presidential candidate can lose the overall popular vote and still become president?

A Presidential candidate can lose the overall popular vote and still become President because the US President is NOT elected by the popular vote. The votes cast by the Electoral College elect the President. This type of thing has happened several times before; this is one reason why Grover Cleveland served two non-consecutive terms.


Can a presidential candidate still win the election even if he loses the electoral college election?

Yes; it happened in 1824. A candidate must have over 50% of the electoral votes to win the electoral college election. Ever since the Election of 1964, that "magic number" has been 270. When nobody has that many, the electoral college no longer has anything to do with the election; the House of Representatives gets the job of electing the President. When that happens, each state gets only one vote, so although there are 435 House Members, no more than 50 votes are cast. The reason that happened in 1824 is that the 3rd- and 4th-place finishers received a total of 30% of the votes. Andrew Jackson had the most popular votes AND the most electoral votes (38%), but the House elected John Quincy Adams President. (Jackson beat Adams four years later.) If no Vice-Presidential candidate has more than 50% of the electoral votes, the Senate elects the Vice President. That happened in 1836, but it wasn't controversial like the 1824 election. The Senate elected the man who was just one vote shy of the required minimum electoral votes.


Why you have an electoral college to elect your president?

The electoral college is based on the population of a state. If a majority of the state votes for a certain Candidate then the state wins all the Electoral votes which is all the Senates and Representatives.


Why are electors so important?

Some reasons why it is considered beneficial: It contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. It enhances the status of minority interests. It contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two-party system. It maintains a federal system of government and representation. However, one of the college's initial benefits has been lost through the expansion and concentration of the US population (and of the elector distribution): it no longer affords an advantage to smaller states, which are marginalized because they cannot influence the outcome of the election. Additionally, while a two-party system benefits from the electoral college, the country as a whole does not directly benefit from the two-party system. Some political party platforms seem designed more to court certain voters than to properly run the country.


Why should citizens vote if electoral votes not us elect the president?

The citizens of the United States do vote in a President. They vote for the President they want their state to vote for. Then their state votes for whoever got the most votes. Just because voting for US President is not done strictly by majority rule does not mean it is unfair.