um same thing to protect their land country,etc.
A high value of military skills and loyalty.
what was one of the major differences between the powers of the emperors in the east and the west
1. The Chinese military is a LAND based military; in the same category as Russia and Europe, since they both occupy the same continent (Eurasia). 2. Japan is a SEA based military; in the same category as Great Britain, since they both occupy Island Kingdoms.
There is no relationship between Constantine and Julius Caesar.There is no relationship between Constantine and Julius Caesar.There is no relationship between Constantine and Julius Caesar.There is no relationship between Constantine and Julius Caesar.There is no relationship between Constantine and Julius Caesar.There is no relationship between Constantine and Julius Caesar.There is no relationship between Constantine and Julius Caesar.There is no relationship between Constantine and Julius Caesar.There is no relationship between Constantine and Julius Caesar.
The U.S Military intelligence had been monitoring the Japanese military movements and attempting to intercept their messages since 1936 after the Japanese invaded Manchuria. (And on the mainland, the F.B.I. had been monitoring contact between the Japanese-American population to their families in Japan.) The U.S. military knew the Japanese were intending to attack, especially since the U.S. had naval bases spread out in the South Pacific, and therefore understood it was a matter of time, however, no one knew exactly when. Intelligence experts thought the Philippines to be the most likely target.
Military situation and Approach of the Imperial Japanese Army are some crucial differences between Chinese and Japanese historiography of the Nanking Massacre.
to defend it's land
cause they both have powerpoint eyes.
All emperors are leaders but not all leaders are emperors. Sort of like the relationship between pork chops and food. When oneterm is a category within a larger more general term, they are not the same thing, no.
The Nationalists & Communists tried to unite against Japan, but they kept fighting each other.
A high value of military skills and loyalty.
They were at war. Michael Montagne
The choosing of emperors by the military occurred mainly during the crisis of the third century, which was a period of military anarchy. Emperors were military commanders who were proclaimed emperors by their troops. They could be challenged by other military commanders who were also proclaimed emperors by their troops. There were wars between rival contenders. The turnover of emperors was high. Many emperors were murdered, sometimes even by their own troops which had proclaimed them emperors. Murder could be the result of power struggles or more simply due to soldiers not wanting to fight civil wars. This fighting and political instability gave the peoples outside the empire opportunities to raid or tryi to invade the empire. The army became seriously overstretched, having to run from the western frontiers to the eastern one and vice versa. The redeployment of troops to the west to the east to fend off an attack there would leave the west exposed to other attacks and vice versa. The situation also led to an economic crisis. Trade collapsed partly due to the disruptions of was and partly due to hyperinflation.
Expansion increased the power of military leaders who supported totalitarianism
Expansion increased the power of military leaders who supported totalitarianism.
All of the above
??? What do you THINK the relationship would be? Japan had just attacked a terretory of the United States, and killed U.S. citizens. At that point, the U.S. military was prepared to destroy Japan as an enemy. After Pearl Harbor, it was not good to be Japanese.