answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
Answer
First three centuriesBy and large, during the first three centuries of Christianity, the Roman Empire chose to ignore Christianity, or merely to display curiosity towards it. It is generally agreed that there was no organised, general, centrally directed persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire before the edict of Emperor Decius in 249. There were some short periods of persecution, but historians now say that official persecution of Christianity was limited to the three persecutions of 249-251, 257 and 305-311 CE. A later Christian tradition is that there were ten periods of persection, but historians can find no evidence for this. Euan Cameron (Interpreting Christian History: The Challenge of the Churches' Past) tells us, "Persecution was sporadic, intermittent, and mostly local."

Another later tradition was that Emperor Nero (54-68 CE) instituted a period of persecution of Christians, but the evidence indicates otherwise. However, Nero probably did unfairly blame some Christians in Rome for starting the Great Fire.

Pliny, who had clearly never assisted in any judicial proceedings against the Christians, submitted to the emperor Trajan an impartial and, in some respects, favourable account of the new superstition, requesting that Trajan would resolve his doubts and instruct him on dealing with Christians. Though Trajan directed the magistrates to punish such persons as are legally convicted, he prohibited them from making any inquiries concerning the supposed criminals. Nor was the magistrate allowed to proceed on every kind of information. . He rejected anonymous charges and strictly required, for those to whom the guilt of Christianity is imputed, the positive evidence of a fair and open accuser. His successor, Hadrian, inflicted capital punishment on any witnesses who unsuccessfully accused their fellows of being Christians. These edicts remained in force and were observed until 303 CE.

Martyr Acts, invented in the second century, were a new genre of Christian literature that helped create a tradition of persecution and suffering under the tyrany of pagan leaders. They were brief and purposive accounts of martyrs' heroism, suffering and death, read out in church meetings and on the anniversaries of martyrs' deaths. The events they described were most unlike the corresponding Roman court transcripts. There seems to be a common structure, which is too formulaic to be believable for modern readers:

  • The hero's modest reluctance but unshakeable faith
  • The volunteer who then fails and recants
  • A crude, uncultured Roman underling
  • The governor/judge's initial courtesy and evolving cruelty
  • His curiosity about Christianity and his easy deception by the martyr, whose double entendre jokes only the Christians understand
  • The martyr's incredible bravery and endurance under torture
  • The pagan crowd as chorus and swing voters
  • A loyal minority of fervent Christians
  • Miracles
  • Death, burial and more miracles.

Both Jews and Christians sought Roman support for one side or another in their bitter disputes. Edward Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) tells us:
The provincial governors declared themselves ready to listen to any accusation that might affect the public safety; but as soon as they were informed that it was a question not of facts but of words, a dispute relating only to the interpretation of the Jewish laws and prophecies, they deemed it unworthy of the majesty of Rome seriously to discuss the obscure differences that might arise among a barbarous and superstitious people. Fourth centuryIn the fourth century, Emperor Constantine gave state patronage, including substantial financial support, to the Christian Church. He called the Nicaean Council, in order to encourage unity and establish a single, agreed dogma for the Church. The army refused to participate in his persecution of the pagan temples, so Constantine sent Christians from the palace, to plunder the temples of their treasures. His mother, Helena, went to Jerusalem and miraculously discovered place of the crucifixion of Jesus, the surprisingly close place of his burial, and the three crosses, still intact, used for Jesus and the two who were crucified with him. With only a brief interlude under Julian the Apostate, the Church flourished, at the expense of the increasingly persecuted pagan temples. By the end of the fourth century, the triumphant Christian church could, with state connivance, destroy and pillage pagan temples for the Church's enrichment.
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

First three centuriesBy and large, during the first three centuries of Christianity, the Roman Empire chose to ignore Christianity, or merely to display curiosity towards it. It is generally agreed that there was no organised, general, centrally directed persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire before the edict of Emperor Decius in 249. There were some short periods of persecution, but historians now say that official persecution of Christianity was limited to the three persecutions of 249-251, 257 and 305-311 CE. A later Christian tradition is that there were ten periods of persection, but historians can find no evidence for this. Euan Cameron (Interpreting Christian History: The Challenge of the Churches' Past) tells us, "Persecution was sporadic, intermittent, and mostly local."


Another later tradition was that Emperor Nero (54-68 CE) instituted a period of persecution of Christians, but the evidence indicates otherwise. However, Nero probably did unfairly blame some Christians in Rome for starting the Great Fire.

Pliny, who had clearly never assisted in any judicial proceedings against the Christians, submitted to the emperor Trajan an impartial and, in some respects, favourable account of the new superstition, requesting that Trajan would resolve his doubts and instruct him on dealing with Christians. Though Trajan directed the magistrates to punish such persons as are legally convicted, he prohibited them from making any inquiries concerning the supposed criminals. Nor was the magistrate allowed to proceed on every kind of information. . He rejected anonymous charges and strictly required, for those to whom the guilt of Christianity is imputed, the positive evidence of a fair and open accuser. His successor, Hadrian, inflicted capital punishment on any witnesses who unsuccessfully accused their fellows of being Christians. These edicts remained in force and were observed until 303 CE.

Martyr Acts, invented in the second century, were a new genre of Christian literature that helped create a tradition of persecution and suffering under the tyranny of pagan leaders. They were brief and purposive accounts of martyrs' heroism, suffering and death, read out in church meetings and on the purported anniversaries of martyrs' deaths. The events they described were most unlike the corresponding Roman court transcripts. There seems to be a common structure, which is too formulaic to be believable for modern readers:

  • The hero's modest reluctance but unshakeable faith
  • The volunteer who then fails and recants
  • A crude, uncultured Roman underling
  • The governor/judge's initial courtesy and evolving cruelty
  • His curiosity about Christianity and his easy deception by the martyr, whose double entendre jokes only the Christians understand
  • The martyr's incredible bravery and endurance under torture
  • The pagan crowd as chorus and swing voters
  • A loyal minority of fervent Christians
  • Miracles
  • Death, burial and more miracles.

Both Jews and Christians sought Roman support for one side or another in their bitter disputes. Edward Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) tells us:
The provincial governors declared themselves ready to listen to any accusation that might affect the public safety; but as soon as they were informed that it was a question not of facts but of words, a dispute relating only to the interpretation of the Jewish laws and prophecies, they deemed it unworthy of the majesty of Rome seriously to discuss the obscure differences that might arise among a barbarous and superstitious people.


Fourth centuryIn the fourth century, Emperor Constantine gave state patronage, including substantial financial support, to the Christian Church. He called the Nicaean Council, in order to encourage unity and establish a single, agreed dogma for the Church. The army refused to participate in his persecution of the pagan temples, so Constantine sent Christians from the palace, to plunder the temples of their treasures. His mother, Helena, went to Jerusalem and miraculously discovered place of the crucifixion of Jesus, the surprisingly close place of his burial, and the three crosses, still intact, used for Jesus and the two who were crucified with him. With only a brief interlude under Julian the Apostate, the Church flourished, at the expense of the increasingly persecuted pagan temples. By the end of the fourth century, the triumphant Christian church could, with state connivance, destroy and pillage pagan temples for the Church's enrichment.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the relationship between church and state in the first three centuries and then in the fourth century?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is there a rejection of godly things within the 21st century church?

There has been a rejection of godly things in all the centuries of the church. The 21st century is really no different.


What did vassals have to do with the church?

The relationship between a vassal and the church was the same as the relationship between any other secular person and the church. The vassal was part of the feudal hierarchy, and the church had a separate hierarchy.


Who started the Roman Catholic Church movement in the 16th century?

.Catholic AnswerNobody started the Catholic Church in the sixteenth century, it had been doing fine for sixteen centuries since Our Blessed Lord started it in the first century.


Was there a relationship between religion and government in the 1640s?

Answer: The Roman Christian Church and its doctrines were created for political reasons (to support a failing Roman Empire) around 300 A.D.. Its descendants, the Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Protestant Church were all created for political reasons. These political creations upheld the "divine right of kings" and stripped people of what we now call "civil liberties" for centuries. Answer: there is always a relationship between government and religion.


What are the people that refused to listen to the Roman Catholic church?

Assuming that you are referring to the Catholic Church, it's just Catholic, not Roman Catholic. Roman is an epithet first commonly used in England after the protestant revolt to describe the Catholic Church. It is never used by the official Catholic Church. . As for the people who "refused to obey", that would be heretics and schismatics, but over the past 2,000 years, there have been a good number of them, for instance, some of the larger, more famous movements have been: . The Catholic Church is nearly two thousand years old, there have been untold heresies which were religious movement against the Church in that time. A short list of the "Great Heresies": The Circumcisers (1st century) Gnosticism (1st and 2nd centuries) Montanism (late 2nd century) Savellianism (early 3rd century) Arianism (4th century) Pelagianism (5th century) Semi-Pelagianism (5th century) Nestorianism (5th century) Monophysitism (5th century) Iconoclasm (7th and 8th centuries) Catharism (11th century) Protestantism (16th century) Jansenism (17th century


What is the movement that rebelled against the Catholic Church called?

Most movements against the Catholic Church have been called heresies, the general title, there have been many: The Catholic Church is nearly two thousand years old, there have been untold heresies which were religious movement against the Church in that time. A short list of the "Great Heresies": The Circumcisers (1st century) Gnosticism (1st and 2nd centuries) Montanism (late 2nd century) Savellianism (early 3rd century) Arianism (4th century) Pelagianism (5th century) Semi-Pelagianism (5th century) Nestorianism (5th century) Monophysitism (5th century) Iconoclasm (7th and 8th centuries) Catharism (11th century) Protestantism (16th century) Jansenism (17th century)


What were the major heresies in the Roman Church?

It's just Catholic, not Roman Catholic. Roman is an epithet first commonly used in England after the protestant revolt to describe the Catholic Church. It is never used by the official Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is nearly two thousand years old, there have been untold heresies which were religious movement against the Church in that time. A short list of the "Great Heresies": The Circumcisers (1st century) Gnosticism (1st and 2nd centuries) Montanism (late 2nd century) Savellianism (early 3rd century) Arianism (4th century) Pelagianism (5th century) Semi-Pelagianism (5th century) Nestorianism (5th century) Monophysitism (5th century) Iconoclasm (7th and 8th centuries) Catharism (11th century) Protestantism (16th century) Jansenism (17th century)


What is an example of a modern relationship between church and state?

pjknkljlkh


What is the relationship between the Puritans and the Pilgrims?

They had both disagreed with the Church of England. It was said that the wanted to "purify" the church.


What is the relationship between a synagogue and a church?

It's usually civil and respectful.


How are protestants related to Catholics?

The first protestants were mostly Catholics in the sixteenth century who decided that the Church that Jesus Christ founded for their salvation was the Church that Jesus Christ founded for their salvation and so that dreamed up their own. To do that, they came up with a novel idea of basing it on the Bible Alone. As Jesus Christ founded His Church on Peter the Apostle, and his successors, and the other Bishops, they realized they had to come up with something different. As the New Testament of the Bible was written entirely by the Catholic Church and preserved entirely by the Catholic Church they had to reinterpret it and put a different spin on it. As it wasn't put together until the late fourth century, they had to ignore four centuries of Christian history. In short protestants are the latest in the long list of heresies that the Catholic Church has dealt with since the beginning: . The Catholic Church is nearly two thousand years old, there have been untold heresies which were religious movement against the Church in that time. A short list of the "Great Heresies": The Circumcisers (1st century) Gnosticism (1st and 2nd centuries) Montanism (late 2nd century) Savellianism (early 3rd century) Arianism (4th century) Pelagianism (5th century) Semi-Pelagianism (5th century) Nestorianism (5th century) Monophysitism (5th century) Iconoclasm (7th and 8th centuries) Catharism (11th century) Protestantism (16th century) Jansenism (17th century)


How did the american revolution impact the relationship between the church and the state?

The American revolution led to the separation of Church and State.