One man, one vote signified that each person voting was able to be counted but only one time. There have been many times that people voted more than one time as identification was not taken at the polls, or multiple votes were cast in an effort to make sure a certain outcome was achieved.
One person's vote should be worth the same as another
Every man over 21 cannot vote. In some countries no one can.
Gerald Ford He received one vote from Richard Nixon.
Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964)The "one man, one vote" rule (also called "one person, one vote") derives from the US Supreme Court ruling in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964) that held state political districts of unequal size resulted in under-representation of some citizens' interests and over-representation of others'. This was considered "unrepublican," per Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, and also unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. In order to meet constitutional standards, districts had to be reapportioned so each had approximately equal population.Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1 (1964) applied the same principle to districts of the US House of Representatives.Both Wesberry and Reynolds decisions were predicated on the landmark ruling in Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962), in which the US Supreme Court decided reapportionment of state legislative districts was not a "political question" that should be resolved through legislation. The Court found legislative conflicts of interest raised justiciable issues that could be addressed and resolved by the Federal courts.
President Andrew Johnson escaped impeachment by one vote. The vote was placed on May 16, 1868, with the Senate voting 35 to 19 to remove the president.
One person's vote should be worth the same as another
Every man over 21 cannot vote. In some countries no one can.
No they did not
Swing Vote
If you mean the Roman Republic, it was nominally ruled by the people, but one man did not have one vote. The Roman voting was done by blocks and one block had one vote.
was a proper method of government.
One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind...
Joshua Mqabuko Nkomo has written: 'One man, one vote'
Wesberry v. Sanders ruling
Wesberry v. Sanders ruling
It CAN be. It IS discriminatory when enough "have-nots" band together and vote to gain access to or confiscate, via government fiat, money or property from the "haves."
the right to vote