It is not yet fully discovered
the general public around ww1 were not happy with the war because of the loss of human life.
yes it was cause if we had not stopped them we would be in a bad placer right now.
The casualties of war are things or people that are lost. A loss of a military or civilian life, as well as the loss of perspective, loss of moral code, or code of honor is my perception of the term.
total war
the loss of life
The machine gun was the greatest reason for loss of life during the first world war. Disease was the 2nd biggest reason for loss of life. After the war, over 22 million people died of tuberculosis worldwide.
yes because if we did not win world war one then life today would be very differant. e.g no world war two.
Russia suffered the greatest loss of life during World War I. There were thousands of casualties on all sides suffered during the war.
Much of the infrastructure in Japan's cities was totally destroyed and the total loss of life reached almost 2.7 million persons.
Not having to go to war and avoid the terrible loss of life sustained in World War 1
The War to End all Wars, the greatest loss in life in modern military history. World War I was the bloodiest conflict in the history of America.
The country with the highest number of casualties was the Soviet Union.
World War 1 became known as 'The Great War' because it was the first truly global war and because of the huge loss of life during 1914-18
I can think of none. There have beem few incidents in history that represent a more stupid and wasteful loss of human life than World War I.
the general public around ww1 were not happy with the war because of the loss of human life.
World War II had an incredibly larger number of deaths if including both civilian and military loss of life. In the second World War, over 60 million people were killed, and in the first World War, approximately 37 million people were killed.
Both China and the USSR suffered serious property damage and loss of life.