Want this question answered?
because some landowners abuse or cheated the workers
Landowners took advantage of the workers
sharecropping did not cause the civil war but it happened after when they couldnt have slaves anymore
After the Civil War.
Technically the colonistss did'nt break their social contract. The King of England decided to impose unfair and unjust taxes and demands on the colonists which broke his end of the social contract with the colonists. therefore, the colonists decided to break off from England, eventually resulting in the Revolutionary War.
Sharecropping itself is not illegal, but the exploitative practices often associated with it can be illegal, such as unfair land rental agreements or poor labor conditions. Some countries have laws regulating agricultural arrangements like sharecropping to protect the rights of tenants and prevent exploitation.
Many were designed to keep the former slaves poor
Sharecropping was unfair to former slaves because it often trapped them in a cycle of debt and poverty. They were typically given small plots of land to farm in exchange for a large portion of their harvest, but were required to purchase supplies on credit from the landowner, leading to a constant state of debt. This system also restricted their mobility and economic advancement, perpetuating the conditions of oppression and exploitation that many had sought to escape after emancipation.
no no no
unconscionability
it effects their sole
Landownership would be an antonym for sharecropping, as it refers to owning land outright as opposed to a tenant farming arrangement.
Explain the unfair contract terms Acts and outline cases where vendors exclusions have failed to hold sway with Court as a procurement specialist?
The families lived on sharecropping land
because some landowners abuse or cheated the workers
sharecropping affected African Americans and poor whites.
Cesar had done sharecropping with his neighbor's.