Italian society is largely viewed as hierarchical. There's slaves at the bottom, freedman above them, and freeborn citizens at the top.
In a largely illiterate society, scribes are frequently something like middle class.
Life in the South for the upper middle class was carefree
The upper class citizens of 1912 were quite contented with their lives, until the industrial uprise (many strikes and demands made by labourers) and the titanic then WW1 etc. there was a class divide like we havnt seen since then. Read An Inspector Calls by J.B. priestley x
The social structure in Russia is divided into various classes. The nobles are the upper class and the lower class is for peasants. There is a middle class for those who are below the upper class but above the lower class.
Much like today, anyone could dance, it wan't confined to a class.
Like who the upper-class society is, etc.
I think that the lower class people like tituba and other helpers were eaiser to accues because they had no rights and no say.Abbigale was high middle class because of her relations to Paris which is upper class and so she had the power like any upper class people in society to accuse the lower class people without being douted.
Nazi Germany was a classless society. The point was that anyone could climb the ranks. (this was another reason why the former upper class did not like the Nazis)
They forced the government to change. They wanted to be in the upper class and did not like all the favors being done for people just because of their blood.
They didnt like it!
Depends on where you are. This would be considered middle class in cities like New York and San Fransisco. But in most other locations, it would be considered upper middle class.
Rulers, nobility and priests, much like any other culture. Perhaps scribes too, but it isn't sure for certain how they were perceived.
The upper class and royalty were treated with a high amount respect and had a lot off power. They helped make destions about the areas they lived in and treated the poor like animals. It was a different time and the poor and the upper class/royalty were to completely seprate groups.
both had a rigid class system
No, modern society has not had a system as rigid and extensive as India's caste system, which has historically dictated social status and occupations based on hereditary groupings. Such a system is considered discriminatory and has been outlawed in many countries.
Although Karl Marx called members of the upper class the "bourgeoisie," the two terms are not synonymous. The bourgeoisie are the people who own and control the means of production, not just the upper class. People may be in the upper class if they are wealthy like professional people and shopowners, but they are not part of Marx's bourgeoisie, because they do not own the means of production of good and they don't employ workers in factories. Likewise, the term "proletariat" does not equate exactly to the "lower class."
Just like any other country, it depends on what class of society you are examining. In just about all societies, the lower class people tend toward less concern about manners. Just as in the United States, British upper class tends to be "proper", middle class tends to be polite, and lower class tends to be "rough".