composition of meteorites
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
I don't know. :p
human remains
One key piece of evidence that was not initially used in support of the continental drift hypothesis was a mechanism explaining how continents could move. It wasn't until the discovery of plate tectonics and the development of the theory of seafloor spreading that a mechanism was found to explain how continents drift.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Yes, fossil evidence such as similar plant and animal species found on separate continents has been used to support the continental drift hypothesis. The distribution of fossils across continents suggests that these land masses were once connected and later moved apart.
The ratio of the price of tea in China to the average density of the Moon. Among other things. You might want to be more specific in questions like this.
200 million years ago
Alfred Wegener used deductive reasoning in developing his continental drift theory. He collected evidence from different fields such as geology, paleontology, and climatology to support his hypothesis that the continents were once connected in a single supercontinent called Pangaea.
mesosaurus
Alfred Wegener used evidence from the fit of continents, distribution of fossils, rock types, and ancient climate data to support his theory of continental drift.
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence (matching plant and animal species across continents), geological evidence (similar rock formations and mountain ranges on different continents), climate evidence (glacial deposits and ancient climate patterns that suggested continents were once connected), and fit of continents (the way the continents seem to fit together like a puzzle) to support his hypothesis of continental drift.