It lacked a zero symbol which was not needed
The Roman numeral "xiil" does not exist in the traditional Roman numeral system. The valid Roman numerals for 11 and 12 are "XI" and "XII," respectively.
MDCCCLXXIX which would be 5936Improved Answer:-The first given answer above is wrong because in todays modern notation of Roman numerals it is the equivalent of 1879 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
The five letter word MIMIC can be formed from Roman numerals but as the individual numerals are in the wrong order it isn't a real Roman numeral.
It is CCCCXLVIII. James15511 The person up there is wrong the REAL ANSWER is CDXLVIII
The Roman Numerals on a grandfather clock display IIII when they should display IV. The reason is that the original maker of the clock had incorrectly written the Roman Numerals.
The Roman numeral "xiil" does not exist in the traditional Roman numeral system. The valid Roman numerals for 11 and 12 are "XI" and "XII," respectively.
MDCCCLXXIX which would be 5936Improved Answer:-The first given answer above is wrong because in todays modern notation of Roman numerals it is the equivalent of 1879 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
The five letter word MIMIC can be formed from Roman numerals but as the individual numerals are in the wrong order it isn't a real Roman numeral.
It is CCCCXLVIII. James15511 The person up there is wrong the REAL ANSWER is CDXLVIII
The Roman Numerals on a grandfather clock display IIII when they should display IV. The reason is that the original maker of the clock had incorrectly written the Roman Numerals.
The way the numerals are written is wrong. MCV = 1105, MVC= 1095 If that way was accepted the best answer I can give you is 905.
The real Roman numeral for 7000 is not a single letter in traditional Roman numerals. Instead, it is typically represented as a combination of letters, such as "VII" followed by a horizontal line above the letters, which multiplies the value by 1000. So, the real Roman numeral for 7000 is written as "VII̅".
6000 is known as MMMMMM in roman numerals but I don't want to sound different (once again); MMMMMM breaks the rule of roman numerals because roman numerals go over three digits.6000- MMMTTI don't know if that is quite right?If someone tells YOU what 6000 is in roman numerals; remember your roman numerals (once again) but if you say 6000 is MMMMMM in roman numerals, guess what... your actually WRONG... VI represents 6 and sometimes VI with a line on top represents 6000, I'm still not sure if MMMTT is quite right.Improved Answer:-It is: (VI) which means 1000*6 = 6000
There was nothing wrong with theGreekand Roman numbering systems. They were complicated. They have beenreplacedby the Arabic numeral system because it is much easier to use.
The reason why they made it was because they wanted to make another way to communicate with people. (p.s, I might be wrong)
XCIX simply IC would be wrong http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Roman_numerals_-_XCIX_or_IC/id/4717682
The answer is 1960.If you think I am wrong Google it.I am 10 years old.Thank You.Solution 1960.Improved Answer:-In todays modern notation of Roman numerals they represent 1965