One of the greatest grievances that each side had was the recognition of the slave population in regards to voting power in the legislature. If the population was considered then the southern states would have more sway in placing representatives within congress.
Southerners favored the annexation of Texas, but Northerners objected that Texas would add another slave state to the Union.
Southerners favored the annexation of Texas, but Northerners objected that Texas would add another slave state to the Union.
One of the greatest grievances that each side had was the recognition of the slave population in regards to voting power in the legislature. If the population was considered then the southern states would have more sway in placing representatives within congress.
Southerners favored the annexation of Texas, but Northerners objected that Texas would add another slave state to the Union.
Briefly put, most Southerners wanted to continue the right to own slaves and most Northerners did not like the practice and did not want to see it extended to new states that came into the union. A fairly large number of Northerners were strongly against slavery and wanted to abolish it throughout the country as soon as possible. Some Southerners had objections to slavery but respected the right of others to keep their slaves.
What did the framers of the constitution agree/disagree upon at the constitutional convention?
The Second Constitutional Convention of the United States is a proposal made in the attempt to improve US politics by renovate the present US Constitution. It is an option that gives governments a way to change things that the states may disagree with.
Because, Texas had a debt toward the US so when they joined they wouldn't have that debt anymore. Also, Northerners objected because annexing Texas means that another slave state would be added, thus upsetting the balance of slave and free states. Southerners favored the annexations because it was in their favor.
Northerners generally supported tariffs because they protected burgeoning industries from foreign competition, fostering economic growth in the industrialized North. In contrast, Southerners opposed tariffs as they disproportionately raised the cost of imported goods and benefited Northern manufacturers at the expense of Southern agriculture, which relied on trade. This fundamental economic divide highlighted the differing interests and priorities between the two regions, contributing to rising tensions leading up to the Civil War.
Northerners generally supported tariffs because they protected their burgeoning manufacturing industries from foreign competition, promoting economic growth in the North. In contrast, Southerners opposed tariffs as they relied heavily on imported goods and feared that higher tariffs would raise prices for consumers and harm their agrarian economy, which was centered on cash crops like cotton. This fundamental economic divide fueled tensions between the regions, contributing to broader sectional conflicts leading up to the Civil War.
Most Northerners and Southerners disagreed about the Kansas-Nebraska Act primarily due to its implications for the expansion of slavery. Northerners opposed the act because it effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise, allowing the possibility of slavery in territories where it had previously been prohibited. Southerners generally supported the act, viewing it as an opportunity to expand slaveholding territories and increase their political power. This disagreement intensified sectional tensions, contributing to the broader conflict leading to the Civil War.
The northern and southern states had two major disagreements at the convention. The North disagreed with the use of slaves, and the South disagreed how people were elected to office.