0
Briefly put, most Southerners wanted to continue the right to own slaves and most Northerners did not like the practice and did not want to see it extended to new states that came into the union. A fairly large number of Northerners were strongly against slavery and wanted to abolish it throughout the country as soon as possible. Some Southerners had objections to slavery but respected the right of others to keep their slaves.
What else can I help you with?
How did northerners and southerners differ in there opposition to abolition?
Northerners generally opposed abolition due to economic interests tied to the cotton industry and fears of social unrest, but many also held anti-slavery sentiments, advocating for gradual emancipation or colonization. In contrast, Southerners vehemently defended slavery as a cornerstone of their agrarian economy and way of life, often viewing abolitionists as a direct threat to their social order and economic stability. While some Northerners pushed for reform, many Southerners rallied around a pro-slavery ideology, leading to a stark regional divide on the issue.
Wanted to allow slavery in the western territories.?
John Calhoun of South Carolina (the 7th Vice President of the US) was among the Southerners who resisted Northern efforts to introduce abolitionist laws in Congress. He died in 1850, just as the anti-slavery movement was growing. The Southerners wanted slavery to move to the western territories. They wanted their already booming economy to be spread into the new states. However, they reached conflict with the Northerners who were not in favor of slavery. The Kansas- Nebraska Act allowed the citizens to vote whether or not they were for slavery caused major problems. This increased tensions between the opposing states. Before Abraham Lincoln's election, the country struggled on the issue of secession. When he took office in 1861, things reached their breaking point and the first Southern states seceded.
How did northeners and southerners react to the Dred Scott decision?
Quite differently - and it drove the two sides even further apart, bringing war closer. The Supreme Court declared that slavery was protected by the Constitution (i.e. the sanctity of a man's property included slave property), so the Missouri Compromise was not valid. In other words, slavery could not be banned from any state of the Union. Naturally, this delighted the Southerners, who thought they could see a prospect of a coast-to-coast slave empire. The Abolitionists were greatly offended - even more so, as the Court had ruled that a black man could not be an American citizen. And even Northerners who had little interest in the slavery issue did not welcome the prospect of slavery on their doorstep.
What was part of territorial expansion was an issue and why?
During the 19th century, the main issue of territorial expansion was slavery. Northerners didn't want slavery to extend into the western regions, while the south did. It was basically the issue of Missouri (Missouri Compromise) all over again, but with soooooo much more territory to deal with. This growing sectionalism between the north and the south would later tear the nation apart, in what is known as the Civil War.
What was the issue of expansion of slavery?
The issue of expansion of slavery was its expansion and growth into Western territories.
What is the difference between Northerners and Southerners over the issue of slavery is an example?
Northerners generally opposed slavery, seeing it as immoral and wanting to abolish it. Southerners, on the other hand, relied on slavery for their economy and were invested in maintaining the institution. This fundamental disagreement over the moral and economic aspects of slavery eventually led to the American Civil War.
What way did the Northerners and Southerners disagree about the issue of slavery at the constitutional convention?
One of the greatest grievances that each side had was the recognition of the slave population in regards to voting power in the legislature. If the population was considered then the southern states would have more sway in placing representatives within congress.
In what ways did northerners and southerners disagree about the issue of slavery at the constitutional convention?
One of the greatest grievances that each side had was the recognition of the slave population in regards to voting power in the legislature. If the population was considered then the southern states would have more sway in placing representatives within congress.
How did the southerners expect northerners to react to the fugitive slave act how did the northerners actually react?
Southerners expected Northerners to comply with the Fugitive Slave Act by helping to capture and return escaped slaves. However, many Northerners reacted with resistance, forming anti-slavery groups to hide and protect fugitive slaves and refusing to cooperate with authorities trying to enforce the law. This led to increased tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery.
What effect did Stowe's stories of little Eva Uncle Tom and Simon Legree have upon the slavery issue More Southerners bought the books than the Northerners. Many Northerners rejected the stereotypes p?
What effect did Stowe's stories of little Eva, Uncle Tom, and Simon Legree have upon the slavery issue? More Southerners bought the books than the Northerners. Many Northerners rejected the stereotypes presented in the stories. The stories became a wedge of division between the North and South over the issue of slavery.
Why did northern and southern Democrats support Franklin Pierce?
The southerners supported Franklin because they trusted him in the issue of slavery. The northerners supported Franklin because he opened a railroad to the west coast , helping revive the slavery controversy.
How did northerners and southerners differ in there opposition to abolition?
Northerners generally opposed abolition due to economic interests tied to the cotton industry and fears of social unrest, but many also held anti-slavery sentiments, advocating for gradual emancipation or colonization. In contrast, Southerners vehemently defended slavery as a cornerstone of their agrarian economy and way of life, often viewing abolitionists as a direct threat to their social order and economic stability. While some Northerners pushed for reform, many Southerners rallied around a pro-slavery ideology, leading to a stark regional divide on the issue.
What effect did the did the Mexican war have on the issue of slavery?
The Mexican-American War caused an internal dispute in the United States government over slavery. The Northerners did not want slavery to spread into the new territories if they were annexed into the United States, while the Southerners wanted the territories to have the right to decide.
How would you contrast the Northern and amp Southern positions on the annexation of Texas?
Generally speaking, Southerners supported the annexation, while Northerners had fears. The main issue involved was slavery. Texas was annexed in 1845.
Why was the question of whether to allow slavery in the territories of the US such an important issue for the northerners and southerners?
The issue of slavery was important to northerners because that meant they could catch runaway laves and they could get a reward for it. it was also important for the southerners because that meant that the money they spent on them was a partial waste.
What changes in the political parties took place in the 1850 and 1840?
The slavery issue changed political parties. The Whig Party collapsed, divided between anti slavery Northerners and proslavery Southerners. With this split, a Democrat won the 1852 campaign for president. Some Whigs joined the new American party.
The South looked at slavery as an economic issue The North viewed slavery as what kind of issue?
The South looked at slavery as an economic issue. The North viewed slavery as a moral issue. In the North, slavery was proving to be unprofitable in the North and was dying out by the end of the American Revolution, but in the South white Southerners were increasingly more defensive of slavery.
