answersLogoWhite

0

i like turtles oh and because they could not leave the manor

User Avatar

Cory Rohan

Lvl 13
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is most accurate about the serfs?

Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+


What is the most accurate statement about serfs?

Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+


The Use of the word bound to?

Serfs were bound to the fief and their lord.


When did the manorial system begin?

The manorial system became firmly established in the Middle Ages, about the time of Charlemagne. Its origins and most important characteristics, however, were in the villa system of the Roman Empire; the coloni of the villas were bound to the soil in the same way serfs were on manors, and the coloni and serfs had the same duties. The laws binding coloni to the soil were enacted by Constantine I in 330 AD.


When did the manorialism begin?

The manorial system became firmly established in the Middle Ages, about the time of Charlemagne. Its origins and most important characteristics, however, were in the villa system of the Roman Empire; the coloni of the villas were bound to the soil in the same way serfs were on manors, and the coloni and serfs had the same duties. The laws binding coloni to the soil were enacted by Constantine I in 330 AD.


Did serfs sell land?

Serfs did not own land. In fact they were bound to the land they lived on and were not permitted to leave it.


How were serfs different from free peasants on medieval manor?

1st Answer:The word "serf" is Latin for slave, so they were slaves. Peasants were not slaves they were tenant farmers working the land for the king and his nobles.2nd Answer:The serfs were bound to the soil, meaning that serfs could not move away from the manor on which they lived. The deal was two way, however, and the lord could not make them move away.By contrast, free peasants were not bound to the soil. They were allowed to move away, but the lord of the manor could also fire them from their jobs and kick them out of their homes.Serfs and freemen alike paid rent. Freemen were not usually organized the same way serfs were. And the rent they paid was more commonly money, where the serfs' rent was commonly in labor or a share of a crop.The Latin word for slave was "servus." Deriving a description of the serf of the Middle Ages from a word from ancient Rome is not going to work, even though the word is related. They were different cultures, and the words had different meanings.


What people in Russia who were bound to the land and worked for a lord?

easy serfs


What title was given to the poor who were bound to the land of the vassal or lord they served?

They were the serfs.


Peasents who were bound to a manor?

Peasants who were bound to a manor were known as serfs or villeins. They were required to work the land and pay dues to the lord of the manor in exchange for protection and the right to live on the land. Serfs were not free to leave the manor without the lord's permission.


Many peasant were serf How was a serf different from slave?

Many of peasants on the manors were serfs. The serfs were part of the property. It a lord sold his manor, the new lord would own the serfs as well as the land. Unlike slaves, however, serfs could not be sold without the land.


What did bound to soil mean in medieval Europe?

Being "bound to the soil" meant that you farmed land on a particular manor and it was illegal for you to go farm elsewhere or to take up another way of making a living. You were tied to that land.