0
first, to get revenge for the death of his father, (well uncle that adopted him) Julius Ceaser. He did this by joining the second Triumverate
but..... following in daddy's footsteps, he gained power & (unlike daddy) respect from the Govt.
He conquered Cleopatra's Empire during the battle of Actium and brought the Pax Romana to Rome.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What were Frederick Douglass goals?
to be a great leader
Who was the first Roman emperer?
In the discussion of who was the first Roman emperor one has to understand that at the end of the Roman Republic there was no new, and certainly not a single, title created with which to indicate the individual who had the supreme power as a monarch. Insofar as emperor could be seen as the English translation of imperator, then Julius Caesar had been an emperor, like several Roman generals before him. Instead, by the end of the civil wars in which Julius Caesar had led his armies, it became clear on the one hand that there was certainly no consensus to return to the old-style monarchy, and that on the other hand the situation where several officials, bestowed with equal power by the senate, fought one another had to come to an end.Julius Caesar-and a few years later Octavian in an even more subtle and gradual way-worked towards several goals: accumulating offices and titles that were of the highest importance in the Republic; making the power attached to these offices permanent; and preventing anyone with similar aspirations from accumulating or maintaining power for themselves. However, Julius Caesar, unlike those after him, did so without the Senate's vote and approval.Another Vew:The title Imperator was not a rulership one - it was an enthusiastic acclaim, given to a successful general on a battlefield after a win, by his soldiers, and had no political significance.An official title of a monarch was Rex (King), but the kings were disposed of 400 years earlier, and any association with pretensions to be king were very dangerous. Earlier in the long-running Roman revolution Sulla took the title of Dictator - normal a six-month appointment to solve an electoral or military problem - and extended it for a couple of years to settle the political problems then stood down, but the trouble makers then set about dismantling his settlement. Later Julius Caesar thought to circumvent this unwinding of reforms by making himself Dictator for life - this was regarded as taking on kingly power, and he was assassinated to end this unacceptable term of office.His heir Octavian solved this problem by taking on the powers, but not office, of a magistrate and of tribune of the plebs, but left the Senate largely intact, calling himself by the traditional senate-leader title Princeps. He additionally took on a neutral honorific title of Augustus, and so avoided the King danger.Modern parlance erroneously uses the more modern word Emperor, which didn't exist at that time. The first 200 years from Augustus onwards is more properly called the Principate, until full authoritarisam took over, when Emperor could reasonable be used to describe the office.Modern usage gives the title Emperor to Octavian Augustus, but it had no meaning to him or anyone at the time, as explained above.
Who is the all time 3 point leader in Utah jazz history?
John Stockton is the leader with 845 3 point field goals he lead in attempts with 2203: Jeff Hornecek is the accuracy leader with .428%
Which former gopher in minnesota's career leader in 3-point field goals made with 191?
Michael Bauer
What were the goals for saladin as a leader?
hes goal was to recapture Jerusalem from the christians to take back his holy land as yous all know it was important to him
What was Augustus Jackson goals?
his goal was to invent a new thing
What focuses on maximizing leader strength minimize weakness and achieving individual leader development goals?
career goals must
What are Core leader three basic goals?
What are Core leader competencies
What were Frederick Douglass goals?
to be a great leader
Who was the first roman emporer?
augustusAnswerOctavianus... later called Caesar Augustus is considered as the first roman emperor. Please note that the most famous roman leader, Julius Caesar had chosen Augustus as his own son. Julius Caesar himself doesn't really count as emperor... he had been blaimed for concentrating the leading positions is one person (himself). If by "empire" the word commonly used for the principate, Octavian/Augustus was the first ruler.True AnswerThe first ruler of the Roman empire was Romulus. You can disagree with me if you think that your smarter than a collage prep. middle school textbook.
Who is a leader that is committed to excellence and is trustworthy?
who is a past leader that was committed to excellence and goals and that is trustworthy
Leader of most field goals made?
Morten Anderson
What were deng xiaoping's goals as china's leader?
he wanted to be pregnant
A person who helps other people reach their goals?
leader
Do you need a leader to achieve goals?
No, you can achieve goals all by yourself. But if there is a team goal it helps to have a team leader. Individually or as a team, the most important thing you need to achieve a goal is a plan.
Who was the first Roman emperer?
In the discussion of who was the first Roman emperor one has to understand that at the end of the Roman Republic there was no new, and certainly not a single, title created with which to indicate the individual who had the supreme power as a monarch. Insofar as emperor could be seen as the English translation of imperator, then Julius Caesar had been an emperor, like several Roman generals before him. Instead, by the end of the civil wars in which Julius Caesar had led his armies, it became clear on the one hand that there was certainly no consensus to return to the old-style monarchy, and that on the other hand the situation where several officials, bestowed with equal power by the senate, fought one another had to come to an end.Julius Caesar-and a few years later Octavian in an even more subtle and gradual way-worked towards several goals: accumulating offices and titles that were of the highest importance in the Republic; making the power attached to these offices permanent; and preventing anyone with similar aspirations from accumulating or maintaining power for themselves. However, Julius Caesar, unlike those after him, did so without the Senate's vote and approval.Another Vew:The title Imperator was not a rulership one - it was an enthusiastic acclaim, given to a successful general on a battlefield after a win, by his soldiers, and had no political significance.An official title of a monarch was Rex (King), but the kings were disposed of 400 years earlier, and any association with pretensions to be king were very dangerous. Earlier in the long-running Roman revolution Sulla took the title of Dictator - normal a six-month appointment to solve an electoral or military problem - and extended it for a couple of years to settle the political problems then stood down, but the trouble makers then set about dismantling his settlement. Later Julius Caesar thought to circumvent this unwinding of reforms by making himself Dictator for life - this was regarded as taking on kingly power, and he was assassinated to end this unacceptable term of office.His heir Octavian solved this problem by taking on the powers, but not office, of a magistrate and of tribune of the plebs, but left the Senate largely intact, calling himself by the traditional senate-leader title Princeps. He additionally took on a neutral honorific title of Augustus, and so avoided the King danger.Modern parlance erroneously uses the more modern word Emperor, which didn't exist at that time. The first 200 years from Augustus onwards is more properly called the Principate, until full authoritarisam took over, when Emperor could reasonable be used to describe the office.Modern usage gives the title Emperor to Octavian Augustus, but it had no meaning to him or anyone at the time, as explained above.
What focuses on maximizing leader strength minimizing weakness and achieving individual leader development goals?
Self-development
