Want this question answered?
Thomas Jefferson, "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."
Some people and organizations do not respect freedom of speech or freedom of press. These people can be prosecuted and jailed.
The answer is no, they didn't expand freedom, they didn't reduce freedom, and they didn't leave freedom unchanged. Freedom isn't something that one can sum like poker chips. Some of what they United States did increased somefreedoms for some people. Other things decreased somefreedoms for some people. Now, one thing to note is that, since freedom cannot be treated as an arithmetic quantity, there is no justification to be found in a claim that morefreedom was gained than was lost. Such a claim is gibberish (as is a claim that less freedom was gained than was lost). So evaluation of policy must be on some other basis.
Purchasing their way out of slavery.
freedom for other african americans
try doing some reseach on arguments against it then reverse it
It is possible that you may die.
There are none.
Religious. They said it was a sin against humanity.
look for it in the book :D
Some of the arguments against internet voting include security risks, electronic and human errors.
In college fights, verbal arguments are the mainly used against either party. Some argument topics include dates, friendships, rumors and competitions.
Arguments for comparable worth stress that individuals who have the same value at an organization should receive the same compensation, regardless of gender. Arguments against comparable worth emphasize that some jobs can be undervalued.
some places are Panama, Cuba, Puerto Rico
The man was hypocrite, he had no reason being in the busniness, and everyone was jealous of his super hot wife.
some people think that animals have rights to but others consider them less important than humans
That it's based on superstition and outdated beliefs, just like all other religions. That's the primary argument against the church.