Want this question answered?
The "pay Roman" is something strange, it sounds like some sort of a tax to me. If you are referring to the "Pax Romana", it was about a 200 year time of peace and prosperity for the Roman empire.The "pay Roman" is something strange, it sounds like some sort of a tax to me. If you are referring to the "Pax Romana", it was about a 200 year time of peace and prosperity for the Roman empire.The "pay Roman" is something strange, it sounds like some sort of a tax to me. If you are referring to the "Pax Romana", it was about a 200 year time of peace and prosperity for the Roman empire.The "pay Roman" is something strange, it sounds like some sort of a tax to me. If you are referring to the "Pax Romana", it was about a 200 year time of peace and prosperity for the Roman empire.The "pay Roman" is something strange, it sounds like some sort of a tax to me. If you are referring to the "Pax Romana", it was about a 200 year time of peace and prosperity for the Roman empire.The "pay Roman" is something strange, it sounds like some sort of a tax to me. If you are referring to the "Pax Romana", it was about a 200 year time of peace and prosperity for the Roman empire.The "pay Roman" is something strange, it sounds like some sort of a tax to me. If you are referring to the "Pax Romana", it was about a 200 year time of peace and prosperity for the Roman empire.The "pay Roman" is something strange, it sounds like some sort of a tax to me. If you are referring to the "Pax Romana", it was about a 200 year time of peace and prosperity for the Roman empire.The "pay Roman" is something strange, it sounds like some sort of a tax to me. If you are referring to the "Pax Romana", it was about a 200 year time of peace and prosperity for the Roman empire.
The tax collectors raised the revenue needed for the development of public works and to pay for the army. The Pax Romana promoted was greater integration of the provinces into the empire. This was achieved through the political stability of this period, the development of public works, such as roads, bridges, ports, aqueducts, sanitation, temples, public buildings and public baths, and the growth of a thriving trading network throughout the empire. The army was important to defend the empire.
The Pax Romana was loosely a 200 year period of peace and prosperity and expansion for the Roman empire. It resulted in an enlarged empire and a larger tax base. Trade was carried on as well as travel for both education and pleasure. This was the time when the great literature of the Golden and Silver ages was produced and also the time when most of the Roman "innovations" such as the invention of the taxi meter, refinement of glass working (windows in particular) and the use of concrete in buildings.
I'm assuming (since the question is posted under the religion section) you are referring to the tax collectors in the Bible. The answer is yes. The Jews did not like tax collectors because they a) represented a foreign government and foreign leadership and b) took their money. Stories from the Bible like Zacchaeus show the generally poor opinion the Hebrews had of tax collectors. In other passages, Jesus is criticized by the religious leaders for associating with tax collectors and sinners.
The whiskey boys hurt the tax collectors all the time.
the king maybe
the patriots would tar and feather them like the tax collectors
The Patriots did not like this law. They responded in violence, like running the Tax Collectors out of town, and the Patriots also boycotted. There were mobs of British citizens roaming the streets and breaking into the Tax Collectors Homes, and breaking their furniture.
They were tax collectors and judges.
You need to specify where and when in history men attacked tax collectors if you want to make it possible to answer this question.
There were two tax collectors one was Matthew and the other was Zachaeus.
A tax collector in ancient Rome was an "exactor".