0
What were the causes and effects of the division of the Roman Empire into 2 parts?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Historians see 395 the point at which the eastern and western parts of the Roman Empire split. This was not due to an imperial decision to do this, but to circumstances. This was the year emperor Theodosius I died. He had appointed his two sons as co-emperors. Arcadius was given the east and Honorius was given the west. This it was not in itself greatly eventful. It was nothing new as the empire had had co-emperors with one in the eastern part of the Roman Empire and one in the west part many times previously.
The empire split because of two main factors. One is that the two co-emperors were young and inexperienced and powerful politicians in the eastern and the western of the empire took advantage of this to conspire against each other. The other, and most crucial, factor was that the Germanic invasions of the western part of the Roman Empire begun 11 years later. The western part of the empire started to crumble under the weight of these invasions and eventually fell. The eastern part of the empire was not affected by these invasions and remained powerful. With the pressure of the invasions, western part lost its political cohesion and there was a lot of infighting and many usurpations. At times, the emperors of the eastern part of the empire took advantage to exert influence in the western part.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you think the division of the empire might have hastened Rome's decline?
no the division of the roman empire was so that the empire could be easier to govern and so it wasn't the division but actually the emperors. also that is why the Byzantine empire lasted longer.
Political effects of the spread of christianity into the roman empire?
The spread of Christianity had political ramifications for the Roman Empire. The empire split into two, Constantinople to the east and Rome to the west
What was a major effect of the fall of the Roman Empire on western Europe?
One of the major causes for the Fall of Roman Empire was the Antagonism between the Senate and the Emperor
What was the division of Rome and the formation of the Byzantine Empire?
The Roman Emperor Constantine I the Great divided the Roman Empire to the west Roman Empire and the east Roman Empire and moved his capital city from Rome to the ancient Greek city of Byzantium which was renamed as New Rome. After Constantine's death his successors renamed the city as Constantinople, a name that survived its conquest by the Ottomans, until 1923 AD.
Why did Theodosius order the division of the Roman Empire after his death?
His two sons fought over who would become the next emperor
The division of the Roman Empire lead to the formation of what empire?
The Byzantine Empire.
How do you think the division of the empire might have hastened Rome's decline?
no the division of the roman empire was so that the empire could be easier to govern and so it wasn't the division but actually the emperors. also that is why the Byzantine empire lasted longer.
Why did The emperor Diocletian divide the Roman Empire into and eastern and western empire?
Diocletian did not divide the Roman Empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.
What impact did the division of the emiperors have on rome?
The Roman Empire was never divided.
What two churches formed after the division of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire?
The Catholic Church in the West and the Orthodox Church in the East
The middle division of the three historical divisions of the roman empire was the?
Republic.1) Pre-Republic2) Republic3) Empire
Political effects of the spread of christianity into the roman empire?
The spread of Christianity had political ramifications for the Roman Empire. The empire split into two, Constantinople to the east and Rome to the west
What is the decline and fall of Rome about?
If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.
Which were the causes for the decline of the roman empire?
An overemphasis on military service. The fall of Christianity. Extremely low inflation.
What were the causes of roman conquest of the Greek Empire?
Rome didn't conquer the Greeks.
Why did Justinian wanted his empire to be like the roman empire?
Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.
What Because the Roman Empire was so large it was necessary to have to lessen confusion.?
Because of the size of the Roman Empire it became necessary to have a division of authority in order to avoid confusion and make the empire run efficiently. Diocletian made this division of power or authority by forming the tetrarchy, in which power and authority was divided between four men.
