Want this question answered?
no
Abraham Lincoln believed that the most prominent slave holding Founding Father generation held the same view as he did with regards to slavery. Lincoln's position was that they as he did, allowed the Federal government to prevent the spread of slavery to the western territories. And that they supported the Northwest Ordinance. With that said, Lincoln believed he was in step with both the founders and the US Constitution. Of course at the time the Supreme Court disagreed with that idea.
The ticket refers to the candidates for president and vice-president for a specific political party.
There was no agreement. It needs to be understood that while the founding fathers supported a democracy, the revolutionary events in France where frighting to them. The French Revolution is a lesson that condones Jefferson's unwillingness to allow the mob to lead the nation. However, with regards to your question...there were no agreements, rather, the US was too unstable at the time to be of much use.
There was an executive under the Articles of Confederation, but he was a mere figurehead and he had no power, unlike the current President. The president under the Articles was elected by the Continental Congress instead of the Electoral College.
no
deepest regards
Abraham Lincoln believed that the most prominent slave holding Founding Father generation held the same view as he did with regards to slavery. Lincoln's position was that they as he did, allowed the Federal government to prevent the spread of slavery to the western territories. And that they supported the Northwest Ordinance. With that said, Lincoln believed he was in step with both the founders and the US Constitution. Of course at the time the Supreme Court disagreed with that idea.
He regards the Iranian president (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) and the current government of Iran as a potential threat and does not want to see Iran develop nuclear weapons. But as with all presidents before him, he has nothing personal against the Iranian people. It is the theocratic government of Iran, with its support for terrorism, that President Obama is concerned about; he does not trust their intentions.
The ticket refers to the candidates for president and vice-president for a specific political party.
The ticket refers to the candidates for president and vice-president for a specific political party.
There was no agreement. It needs to be understood that while the founding fathers supported a democracy, the revolutionary events in France where frighting to them. The French Revolution is a lesson that condones Jefferson's unwillingness to allow the mob to lead the nation. However, with regards to your question...there were no agreements, rather, the US was too unstable at the time to be of much use.
Criticism regarding the president of the Philippines has been prevalent in recent times. This is in regards to various issues such as poverty and corruption within the country.
yes In this economy, that is all most fathers can get. see links below
In regards to the President's security detail, essentially yes. Where ever the President goes he is accompanied by a certain number of secret service agents.
Properly, it's suppose to require one state to honor a custody award from another state, but as regards custodial fathers, in reality it has little power.
The Vice President. The Constitution does say that Senators and Representatives are to be paid out of the public funds, and that the President, Judges and Justices will also be paid, but the Vice President's compensation is not mentioned.