against: -to annex colonies would violate the "consent of the governed" philosophy in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. -Despotism abroad might well beget despotism at home. -Imperialism was costly and was unlikely to turn into a profit. -annexation would propel the U.S. into the political and military cauldron of East Asia. For: -played possible trade profits. -"civilizing mission"
yes! Imperialism
There is no reason for imperialism other than greed and fear. Since the US never really had to fear any country after the War of 1812 I would have to say fear was not a reason for imperialism!
A need for cheap labor, Economic competition w/ nations & political/military competition with other nations spurred US imperialism
The US fought them in the Spanish American War.
In the Spanish American War.
1- What were the major arguments for and against U.S. entry into the Great War? What position do you find most persuasive? Why?
I can't see any arguments against it. It seems correct to me.
The arguments that you could offer against the removal of forests to make room for new neighborhoods include deforestation which effects the environment, climate change, and much more.
fun.
yes! Imperialism
There is no reason for imperialism other than greed and fear. Since the US never really had to fear any country after the War of 1812 I would have to say fear was not a reason for imperialism!
imperialism
1890-1920
it happen in the us and in britant
wemo
A need for cheap labor, Economic competition w/ nations & political/military competition with other nations spurred US imperialism
They believed that expansion went against american ideals