Want this question answered?
"We were following orders"
Allied punishments weakened the German Economy after World War 1, while Allies helped revive the German economy after World War 2.
They claimed that they were just following orders.
They claimed that they were just following orders.
They claimed that they were just following orders.
They were just following orders
Before the United States had entered World War II following the attack on Pearl Harbor, the country had imposed economic punishments on Japan because of the Second Sino-Japanese War. Following a series of increasingly tense 'incidents' from 1931 to 1937, a total war broke out between Japan and China. China was supported by the United States even though Japan received most of their petroleum and steel from the US.
"Orders to advance" means "orders to move forward".
The most common defense was that of being obedient to orders . ~ Look to the related link below for additional information .
Ostensibly , they were just following orders .
"We were following orders"
hahah
No, the Nuremberg trials established that individuals are responsible for their actions, even if they were following orders. The principle of "just following orders" is not a valid defense for committing war crimes or crimes against humanity.
if a soldier was considered to be acoward then he was put before a firing squad.
Allied punishments weakened the German Economy after World War 1, while Allies helped revive the German economy after World War 2.
They claimed that they were just following orders.
They claimed that they were just following orders.