theory is one
"Theory"
Not sure
No, historically many scientists have been strongly religious; nowadays more scientists tend to be atheists than the general public and it also seems likely that the more senior the scientist, the more likely they are to be atheist. There are scientists who are religious and try to contort science to prove their religious beliefs. On the other hand, there are scientists who are religious and understand perfectly that religion and science are completely separate and distinct. In the world of science, those within it are all unique individuals, just like the rest of the world. So one way of believing or thinking anything can't be assumed.
A hypothesis is a general guess as to what a result may be. In general, it is the second step of the "scientific process". In the average "scientific process" you start with a question, form a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, make a conclusion, and report results.
Scientists are definitely not better than teachers .It is the teachers who care about us ,who guide us. And it is the teachers who established the growth of young students into future scientists.
The word "theory" is used differently by scientists than by the general public. The general public means "theory" as a proposed explanation for something which is not proven and which is possibly spurious; scientists may mean "theory" in that way, but may also mean "theory" as a hypothesis that has been tested multiple times and has been validated each time. Also leukocytes which mean white blood cells.
"Theory"
theory is one
Not sure
Scientists need to communicate with their fellows and the general public. New ideas that may form in their heads, are difficult for others to grasp. It is better to graphics, than just rely on the written or spoken word.
The same set of data that scientists see can be interpreted differently based on how they look at it. If the experiment is not done correctly than it may make the data hard to understand so it can be interpreted differently. Plus there is their own opinion's that come into to play and could possibly bias the conclusion of the results.
Holding yourself to a higher standard than the general public basically means not doing anything illegally, like fighting, drinking and driving, or doing drugs.
Differently THAN is correct. My question was: is it "differently than" or "differently from" but I can't find any examples of "differently from" in all of Google, so I have to assume "differently than" is the correct choice. 'Different FROM' is correct, from this. 'differently from' arises. Searching Google [I notice your correct but unusual capitalisation of the proper noun ' Google'] implies you are interested in the wisdom of crowds rather than grammatical correctness.
Infrared binoculars are available to the general public but are generally more expensive than conventional binoculars. The cheapest go for about $75 and can be as expensive as $600.
Masturbate in public. Doesn't get more liberal than that.
Scientists know the Earth's core is made of a different material because earthquake waves pass through liquids, like the Earth's outer core, differently than they pass through solids.
Plants are made out of cells with cell walls constructed of cellulose, the fiberous pieces in plants. Fungi, in contrast, have cells walls constructed of chitin. Fungi are also heterotrophs, obtaining nutrients from other living organisms. Plants are autotrophs, creating nutrients from photosynthesis. Fungi don't have leaves. Plants do. In general, fungi are fundamentally different than plants. For that reason, scientists categorize them differently.