0
A scientific law is a description of observed phenomena that repeat (i.e. not a one-time event). A hypothesis seeks to explain the law. Hypotheses that are able to demonstrate the ability to make predictions about the law may become a theory. Hypotheses and theories attempt to explain laws, not the other way around.
What else can I help you with?
When reading a scientific paper how would you know that a specific hypothesis could go on to become a law?
I would imagine any hypothesis could go on to be a law but depending on the subject, I would guess most do not
How is Hypothesis different from scientific law?
A hypothesis is a guess when a scientific law has been answered and proven.
What describe the behavior of something in nature a law or a hypothesis?
Hypothesis
What is the difference between hypothesis and law?
A hypothesis is what someone suggests could be true, and then tests it to see whether or not it is true. A law is what has been proven to be true.
What is the correct order for the steps of scientific method?
The correct steps for the scientific method are: Observation Hypothesis Theory Scientific Law
Is the factor being measured in an experiment a hypothesis or scientific law?
Scientific law :)
How does hypothesis become a law or principle?
Look up the definition of an "hypothesis" and look up the definition of a "law." Now look at hypotheses are tested. Can a theory ever become law? What are the limiting factors of an hypothesis versus the limitations of a law, and how are each established? Answer those questions, and you will find your answer.
How can a hypothesis turn in to a thery?
Yes, if there is enough evidence and data to show that the hypothesis is most likely true.
Why do you formulate hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a guess about the outcome of an experiment due to research. You basically say, "I think the substance will dissolve when I add water to it," then test your theory out.Answerit is simple,hypothesis is a suggested solution or explanation to a problem or a phenomenon. so u will just write what u think is the solution to that problem. for example is a newtons law .it was first a hypothesis and when it accepted it became a law AddendumA hypothesis does not graduate into a law. A hypothesis explains something, a law describes basic behavior.The law of gravitation is the description of the behavior - the theory of gravitation is the explaination for why things fall down.They are related, but not the same thing.
If a scientist finds new evidence that contradicts a law or hypothesis then?
There are several things which follow such a discovery. First, the scientist would want to publish the findings so that other scientists could examine the evidence as well, and see if they can also observe a contradiction with a previously accepted law or hypothesis, or whether they will discover some error in the methodology, or will be unable to reproduce the phenomenon. Secondly, if the evidence is found to be reliable, it will be necessary to come up with a new hypothesis or law that is consistent with the new evidence, and which can replace the old hypothesis or law, subject to continued testing and observation.
How observations become a scientific law?
Observations form the basis of hypothesis, Mathematical modelling builds a therory based on the hypothesis. Proof of the validity of the model forms the law.
What is a hypothesis that does not explain an observation?
When you are using the scientific method, you would try to imagine a hypothesis which explains an observation, but you might not succeed. A hypothesis that does not explain an observation would be considered a failed hypothesis. You would then need to invent a different hypothesis.
