Locke would likely appreciate our democratic systems and individual rights protections, while also emphasizing the need for limited government intervention. Hobbes may view our modern society as chaotic and in need of strong centralized authority to maintain order and prevent conflict. Both philosophers would probably have reservations about various aspects of contemporary society, such as government surveillance and erosion of personal privacy.
A major difference between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke was their views on the social contract. Hobbes believed in a strong, authoritarian government to control human nature, while Locke believed in a more limited government that would protect individual rights and property.
Thomas Hobbes was more associated with mercantilism than John Locke. Hobbes believed in a strong central government that could regulate and control trade in order to maintain social order and stability, aligning with mercantilist principles. Locke, on the other hand, emphasized individual rights and a limited government role in economic affairs.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke had very different views of human nature. The basic difference between the two of them is that Hobbes had a rather negative view of human nature while Locke had a much more positive view of human nature. You can see this difference in the kinds of political systems they each advocated. Hobbes, thought that only a monarch, a "leviathan" of a power, could keep people in check due to their inherent badness. By contrast, Locke thought that people were good enough to be able to govern themselves. He thought that the people were good enough that they would be able to set up representative governments that would maintain a stable society
John Locke argued that, just as it is impossible for a large planet to orbit around a small moon, so too was it impossible for the large American colonies to forever remain in the orbit of the small nation of Great Britain.
Hobbes had a pessimistic view of human nature, believing that people were naturally self-interested, driven by a desire for power and survival. He argued that without a strong central authority to maintain order, society would descend into a state of constant conflict and chaos.
John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are two philosophers who would agree with the idea that the state exists to serve the will of the people. They both believed in the social contract theory, where individuals give up certain rights in exchange for the protection and support of a government that is based on the consent of the governed.
Thomas Hobbes and john Locke had very different views of human nature. The basic difference between the two of them is that Hobbes had a rather negative view of human nature while Locke had a much more positive view of human nature. You can see this difference in the kinds of political systems they each advocated. Hobbes, thought that only a monarch, a "leviathan" of a power, could keep people in check due to their inherent badness. By contrast, Locke thought that people were good enough to be able to govern themselves. He thought that the people were good enough that they would be able to set up representative governments that would maintain a stable society
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke had very different views of human nature. The basic difference between the two of them is that Hobbes had a rather negative view of human nature while Locke had a much more positive view of human nature. You can see this difference in the kinds of political systems they each advocated. Hobbes, thought that only a monarch, a "leviathan" of a power, could keep people in check due to their inherent badness. By contrast, Locke thought that people were good enough to be able to govern themselves. He thought that the people were good enough that they would be able to set up representative governments that would maintain a stable society
Thomas Hobbes was more associated with mercantilism than John Locke. Hobbes believed in a strong central government that could regulate and control trade in order to maintain social order and stability, aligning with mercantilist principles. Locke, on the other hand, emphasized individual rights and a limited government role in economic affairs.
John Locke, Harrington, Hobbes, and Rousseau would likely agree on the importance of social contract theory, the rights of individuals to govern themselves, and the concept of the state and its role in protecting citizens' liberties. They might also concur on the idea that government legitimacy comes from the consent of the governed.
Popular sovereignty arose from the Enlightenment teaching of Rousseau, Hobbes and Locke. It comes from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
i think hobbes claw.
Harry Locke was born on December 10, 1913 and died on September 17, 1987. Harry Locke would have been 73 years old at the time of death or 101 years old today.
Joseph Locke was born on August 9, 1805 and died on September 18, 1860. Joseph Locke would have been 55 years old at the time of death or 209 years old today.
17th century British philosopher. Author of Leviathan (1651).
Sumner Locke Elliott was born on October 17, 1917 and died on June 24, 1991. Sumner Locke Elliott would have been 73 years old at the time of death or 97 years old today.
No. The US Federal Government has completely overstepped the boundaries set forth by the founding fathers. If they were alive now they would be leading a second Revolution.