Want this question answered?
By testing your results, and explain in your conclusion what went wrong
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
The conclusion is the goal of performing the experiment, without it the written results of the experiment would only be a "jumble of data". Other scientists need the conclusion both to validate the experimenter's reasoning and to decide on future experimental directions to take.
Logic is a very considerable subject, which would be impossible to present to you in a single answer to your question. However, I will recommend a book. If you read "The Demon Haunted World" by Carl Sagan, you can learn a lot about logical reasoning.
He would develop an experiment. He has already made his hypothesis, he already drew his conclusion, and has already analyzed his data. To develop an experiment is the last possible thing for him to do. Good luck on whatever you needed this for hun. ;)
The conclusion is what happens during the experiment. In this experiment it was determined that the germination would produce certain plants.
Conclusion is what you would find at the end of the experiment. The judges would use it as such "What was your conclusion?"
One Hundred percent eventually would be the logical conclusion.
I would have to say Research/Data, or Conclusion.
I think it would be the conclusion.
your experiment would be to state the problem,make an hypothesis,research,analyze,experiment,then comes your conclusion
By testing your results, and explain in your conclusion what went wrong
If you documented all your results, had a partner, had a witness, completed the experiment many times with the same results, and tested the experiment on the proper things then this would be good validation.
The most logical conclusion about "Life of Pi" according to the diagram would likely be that the story is centered around themes of faith, survival, and the power of storytelling. The diagram would show how these elements are interconnected and drive the plot and character development throughout the novel.
The Accuracy of the results.The Validity of the experiment (does it work as planned and actually reflect your question)The Repeatability. (if you - and especially others - cant repeat it then it is not valid conclusion)Possible Variables that would effect the result.
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given