answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is a 9 letter word for conclusion?

For an ending, the word could be "summation". For a logical determination, the word could be "deduction" or "inference".


What makes an inference different from proof?

A proof assumes that there is only one correct answer/conclusion to a series of logical statements. An inference is also a conclusion, but it is possible that the connection from fact to conclusion could be interpreted differently by different people.


What question would help in determining whether the conclusion above valid?

To determine whether the conclusion is valid, you could ask, "What evidence supports the premises leading to this conclusion?" This question encourages an examination of the logical connections and the reliability of the data or assumptions that underpin the conclusion. Additionally, asking, "Are there any counterexamples or alternative explanations that challenge this conclusion?" can help assess its robustness.


Do all valid arguments have true conclusions?

No, valid arguments can have false conclusions. Validity refers to the logical connection between the premises and the conclusion, ensuring that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. However, the validity of an argument does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion, as the premises themselves could be false.


What would be a logical conclusion for kaylas experiment?

To provide a logical conclusion for Kayla's experiment, one would need to evaluate the results against her initial hypothesis. If the data supports her hypothesis, she could conclude that her experimental conditions had the expected effect. Conversely, if the results contradict her hypothesis, she may need to reconsider her methodology or explore alternative explanations. Overall, the conclusion should summarize the findings and suggest potential implications or future research directions.


Which objects began to form in your universe earlier stars or galaxies?

Galaxies are the massive collection of stars. Therefore galaxies could not have formed without stars.


What is most likely used to lead a reader to jump to a conclusion?

A logical fallacy, such as generalizations or false cause, could lead readers to jump to a conclusion. These fallacies often present misleading or incomplete information that can sway the reader's thinking towards a predetermined outcome. Emotional appeals or biased language may also influence readers to reach a premature conclusion.


Why might there be a black hole at the center of most galaxies?

The speed of rotation of a galaxy is related to the mass of the galaxy. Most galaxies appear to be spinning more quickly than their masses could account for, leading some scientists to believe that (many? most?) galaxies are heavier than they appear to be. So if there is a lot of extra mass that we cannot see, a black hole is a logical supposition. We can't prove it - yet - but many astronomers believe that supermassive black holes may reside in the centers of most galaxies.


What do galaxies think?

Milky way - "I bet i could take you on in a fight, Andromeda!" Andromeda - "Bring it on!" No galaxies do not think!


Could you exist if galaxies did not?

no we couldn't because galaxies mean the milky way and if the milky way wasn't here we wouldn't


What is the definition of inferring and an example?

An inference is the act of coming to a logical conclusion without actually witnessing or having first hand knowledge of an event. Example: From the way he stormed out of the audition room, I could infer his audition went poorly.


Can't we communicate with other galaxies?

no because we have no way of knowing what kind of life forms are on other galaxies because they could be aliens(: