The result of a direct democracy at the national level would be all citizens participating policy making and running the government. In as much as this is a good system, it is time consuming and may be costly.
In a direct democracy at the national level, citizens would directly participate in decision-making processes through initiatives and referendums. This could lead to increased political engagement and participation, but could also result in potential challenges related to uninformed decision-making, majority tyranny, and decision delays due to the time-consuming nature of direct democracy.
A direct democracy at the national level is likely to result to national integration.
随着近现代以来资本主义社会的高速发展,各类加速主义思潮纷纷涌现,往往都具有技术决定论、技术崇拜或乐观一进步主义文明论的倾向。不过,此时的加速主义并不带有特定的政治立场,更不具有革命意义。1960年代,德勒兹还提出资本主义的发展与技术加速在造成压迫剥削的同时也带来了解放
the same effect.
Democraticcountry's are the result of wealth slowly making its way to the general public. This and the economic system that came as the result of the industrial revolution led to a system of education and knowledge where first the nobility and then the religious institutions were striped of their power. Most of the country's in the world that are not democracy's don't even understand what the term entails, they are ruled by corrupt religious and military centers of self interest that depend on the metaphysical reasoning of religion and or the reasoning of simple brute force. It will still take some time before these tenets become a thing of the past. The short answer is, They were not lucky enough to have gone through the industrial revolution without the hind sight of history.
Failure to fulfill duties as citizens can result in a breakdown of society, weakened democracy, and lack of progress. It can lead to increased corruption, inequality, and a loss of trust in government institutions. Ultimately, it hinders the overall well-being and development of a nation.
Political budgeting can lead to budget decisions that may prioritize short-term gains over long-term fiscal stability. This can result in populist measures that may not be sustainable in the long run, leading to deficits and debt accumulation. It can also make it challenging to allocate resources efficiently and effectively based on the needs of the country rather than political considerations.
the people who elected them. They are accountable for their actions and decisions, as they are meant to serve the best interests of the citizens they represent. Failure to fulfill their responsibilities can result in being voted out of office in the next election.
kanpur Univercity Result BA-1year 2009 result kab aayega
direct democracy was established
a failing economy and a growing lack of faith in democracy.
The United States is a representative republic, not a direct democracy, as a result, the question is unanswerable. As for how the US became a representative republic, this was through the approval of the US Constitution of 1789, which is still in power today.
In a dictatorship, only one person's opinion matters. In a democracy, multiple people's opinions matter. As a result, you are more likely to have disagreement in a democracy than a dictatorship. This disagreement is usually termed as "gridlock" by those who are annoyed by it.
The direct incitement test allows government to limit speech that will likely result in imminent lawless action.
Hawaii,Iceland, Yellowstone National park and a couple others
The political system where those who have governmental authority get and retain authority directly or indirectly as a result of winning free elections is called Representative Democracy. Direct Democracy is when citizens assemble to discuss and pass laws and select their officials.
The rights of the minority may be taken away. Under the republic form in the US, a majority should not be able to subvert the rights of a minority, but it has repeatedly occurred.
National parks such as Yellowstone are a result of the
The direct result of aerobic respiration is the production of ATP from the breakdown of glucose.
The more people you have in a direct democracy, the harder it becomes to get them all in the same room at the same time to find out how they all vote. For large groups, you then get into polling and mail-in ballots, which is very time-consuming and hard to organize, as well as creating opportunities for fraud. And it is harder to involve everybody and keep them informed. You can broadcast a debate on television, but there is no guarantee that everybody who will be voting is watching your debate. It is also true that large groups of people seem inevitably to include large numbers of fools, who are going to vote in an unwise manner. While this is also a problem of representative democracy, it seems to be an even greater problem with direct democracy. The majority may rule, but there is no guarantee that they will do so with any wisdom.
Beats are the direct result of the interference that is caused by the difference in frequencies of two sound waves.