answersLogoWhite

0

The result of a direct democracy at the national level would be all citizens participating policy making and running the government. In as much as this is a good system, it is time consuming and may be costly.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Political Science

What might result if individuals failed to fulfill their duties as citizens?

If it's a country that claims to be a democracy, that democracy would fail. A democracy depends on citizen involvement-- especially voting, but also running for office or supporting candidates and causes. It also depends on a free press and the oversight of journalists, to keep the government honest. If no citizens participate, if there are no impartial and involved journalists, that could enable the emergence of a dictatorship of some kind.


Why is direct democracy not used anymore?

Democraticcountry's are the result of wealth slowly making its way to the general public. This and the economic system that came as the result of the industrial revolution led to a system of education and knowledge where first the nobility and then the religious institutions were striped of their power. Most of the country's in the world that are not democracy's don't even understand what the term entails, they are ruled by corrupt religious and military centers of self interest that depend on the metaphysical reasoning of religion and or the reasoning of simple brute force. It will still take some time before these tenets become a thing of the past. The short answer is, They were not lucky enough to have gone through the industrial revolution without the hind sight of history.


What is the difference between parliamentary and presidential democracy, and how do these systems impact the functioning of government and representation of the people?

In a parliamentary democracy, the executive branch is led by a prime minister who is chosen from the legislative branch. The government is accountable to the parliament and can be removed through a vote of no confidence. In a presidential democracy, the executive branch is separate from the legislative branch, with the president serving as both the head of state and government. The president is elected separately from the legislature and serves a fixed term. The impact of these systems on government functioning and representation of the people is significant. In a parliamentary system, decisions are made collectively by the ruling party or coalition, leading to more consensus-based decision-making. This can result in quicker policy implementation but may also lead to less accountability as the ruling party has more control. In contrast, a presidential system allows for a more direct link between the president and the people, but can also lead to gridlock if there is divided government. Overall, parliamentary democracies tend to have more stable governments but may struggle with representation of minority voices, while presidential democracies can provide more direct representation but may face challenges in governance efficiency.


What is the most likely explanation for the shape of Congressional District 2?

The shape of Congressional District 2 is likely due to gerrymandering, where boundaries are manipulated to favor a particular political party or group. This can result in oddly shaped districts that may not reflect the demographic makeup of the area.


What are the disadvantages of compulsory voting and how do they impact the democratic process?

Compulsory voting can limit individual freedom and may lead to uninformed or coerced voting. This can result in a less engaged electorate and potentially skewed election outcomes. It may also undermine the principle of voluntary civic participation in a democracy.

Related Questions

What was the result of the poorer Athenians protest?

direct democracy was established


The rise in military power in japan was a direct result of?

a failing economy and a growing lack of faith in democracy.


How did the direct democracy in the US form?

The United States is a representative republic, not a direct democracy, as a result, the question is unanswerable. As for how the US became a representative republic, this was through the approval of the US Constitution of 1789, which is still in power today.


Why does democracy cause gridlock?

In a dictatorship, only one person's opinion matters. In a democracy, multiple people's opinions matter. As a result, you are more likely to have disagreement in a democracy than a dictatorship. This disagreement is usually termed as "gridlock" by those who are annoyed by it.


Does direct incitement test allows government to limit speech?

The direct incitement test allows government to limit speech that will likely result in imminent lawless action.


The political system where those who have governmental authority get and retain authority directly or indirectly as a result of winning free elections is called?

The political system where those who have governmental authority get and retain authority directly or indirectly as a result of winning free elections is called Representative Democracy. Direct Democracy is when citizens assemble to discuss and pass laws and select their officials.


What problems may result a direct democracy?

The rights of the minority may be taken away. Under the republic form in the US, a majority should not be able to subvert the rights of a minority, but it has repeatedly occurred.


What problems might result from a direct democracy?

The more people you have in a direct democracy, the harder it becomes to get them all in the same room at the same time to find out how they all vote. For large groups, you then get into polling and mail-in ballots, which is very time-consuming and hard to organize, as well as creating opportunities for fraud. And it is harder to involve everybody and keep them informed. You can broadcast a debate on television, but there is no guarantee that everybody who will be voting is watching your debate. It is also true that large groups of people seem inevitably to include large numbers of fools, who are going to vote in an unwise manner. While this is also a problem of representative democracy, it seems to be an even greater problem with direct democracy. The majority may rule, but there is no guarantee that they will do so with any wisdom.


National parks such as Yellowstone are a result of?

National parks such as Yellowstone are a result of the


What is is a representative democracy?

Nearly all democracies are of this kind. The adult citizens elect resprentatives: they don't govern themselves directly. Only very small communities can govern themselves directly ("direct democracy") but even then it is often difficult. Three of the least populous Swiss cantons have something close to direct democracy. In Canton Glarus, for example, the laws made by representatives are initially only provisional. Once a year all the adult citizens meet in the capital and vote to confirm or reject the previous year's provisional laws. I wonder if that would work in any state of the U.S.? A referendum, if the result is binding, would also be a form od direct democracy.


What development has not been a result of technological development?

Democracy, Language


How do you start a Australian Democracy?

Too late, Australia is a democracy. however As a result of Australia being a democracy one can change the nature of the way the democracy operates through the use of referendums directly to the people.