I DONT KNOW
Their populations would boom because they would no longer be preyed upon. Ultimately, though, they would most likely exceed their food supply and eventually have their own population crash.
If herbivores were removed from the planet, the food chain wouldn't have a bottom. Some carnivores eat smaller carnivores, but the lowest carnivore on the food chain would die if herbivores would be removed, causing a chain reaction and, well, the carnivores that eat that carnivore would die, and the carnivores that eat THAT carnivore will die... etc. The world would be a total mess.
it would be a carnivore
Answer #1: the top carnivore is the animal right at the top of the food chain... it is not eaten by anything e.g. grass------> grasshopper----->rat----->snake---->hawk the hawk would be the top carnivore because nothing eats it in this food chain if there are any errors or anything to be added please do edit my answer if it not right. Answer: #2 The final carnivore in any food chain is called a top carnivore. Top carnivores are not eaten by any other animals (at least while they are alive). For example: A wolf is both a secondary consumer and a top carnivore, since it obtains its energy from the deer and no other animals eat the wolf. wolf (third trophic level, secondary consumer) -> deer (second trophic level, primary consumer) -> spruce tree (first trophic level, producer)
I would say omnivore or carnivore, Most birds are usually carnivore or omnivore, just to make sure research about the turkey
No first level consumer will eat a mouse because first level consumers don't eat meat. A second level consumer (a carnivore or omnivore) would eat a mouse.
they would fight each other until they were to tired or one killed the other
The second level consumers would have nothing to feed off, and therefore would commence eating themselves. Eventually the ecosystem would die out.
The number of first level consumers would decrease causing the second level to also decrease and so on up the food chain.
At the moment humans can be at different trophic levels depending on what they eat. A vegetarian is at the second trophic level as s/he eats only plants. Someone who ate only grazing animals would be at the third level. If you eat a carnivore such as a tuna fish you are at the fourth level. Most of us eat both plants and animals so we don't really have a level. That said, if we all moved to a specific diet there would probably be gradual genetic changes to favour our coping with that. We see some evidence of this in isolated groups with restricted diets today.
First of all, a second level consumer is a living thing that eats things that eat producers (plants, etc.). So, if a producer is grass, say, then the consumer would be sheep. Then, wolves eat sheep (or so they say). A wolf would then be a second level consumer because it eats thing that eat producers. Another example would be carnivorous fish. Mosquito fish eat duckweed, and bigger, carnivorous fish eat the mosquito fish. The big, carnivorous fish would be the second level consumer. A snake could be a second level consumer because it is a carnivore eating a herbivore. Herbivores are first level consumers. Cats, dogs, and humans can also be second level consumers.
the second level
Their populations would boom because they would no longer be preyed upon. Ultimately, though, they would most likely exceed their food supply and eventually have their own population crash.
If herbivores were removed from the planet, the food chain wouldn't have a bottom. Some carnivores eat smaller carnivores, but the lowest carnivore on the food chain would die if herbivores would be removed, causing a chain reaction and, well, the carnivores that eat that carnivore would die, and the carnivores that eat THAT carnivore will die... etc. The world would be a total mess.
It would fluctuate widely.
carnivore
Yes