the particles would split tocreate multiple unstoppable objects
It's a paradox known as the "unstoppable force paradox" and it challenges the idea that both an unstoppable force and an immovable object can exist simultaneously. It's a thought experiment that raises questions about the fundamental laws of physics and what would happen in such a scenario.
This scenario poses a paradox because it assumes the existence of two contradictory concepts - an immovable object and an unstoppable force. In reality, both cannot coexist, so the outcome is undefined or illogical. Physics does not provide a definitive answer to this hypothetical situation.
If the unstoppable object was smaller, then it would pierce a hole through the immovable object, not moving the object, and not stopping.
If an object is immobile, it means that the net force acting on it is zero. This is in accordance with Newton's First Law of Motion which states that an object at rest will remain at rest unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
Collided Into would be with a stationary object while "with" would be with another moving object.
If an uncontrollable force is going to hit an immobile object, the force will transfer energy to the object upon impact. Depending on the magnitude of the force and the strength of the object, the object may experience deformation, breakage, or remain unaffected.
No. The moon formed after a planet-sized object collided with Earth.
This scenario presents a logical paradox because if the force is truly unstoppable, then it should be able to move any object regardless of its immovability. However, if the object is truly unmovable, then no force, not even an unstoppable one, should be able to move it. This dilemma illustrates the limitations of our understanding of physics and the concept of infinity.
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
Basic paradoxes are examples of questions that cannot be answered. For example, what happens when an immovable object meets an unstoppable force? Since neither an immovable object nor an unstoppable force exist in reality, there is no way to determine what would happen in this theoretical situation. Source: personal experience
Stationary or immobile objects.