0
What else can I help you with?
What happens when an irresistable force meets an immovable object?
This is an exercise in logic. If an unstoppable force exists, then an immovable object cannot exist, because it would be able to be moved by the unstoppable force, and vice versa. Sideways Logic The unstoppable force does not "stop", the immovable object does not move : the unstoppable force ricochets off the immovable object!
What happens when an unstopable force meets an immobile object?
It's a paradox known as the "unstoppable force paradox" and it challenges the idea that both an unstoppable force and an immovable object can exist simultaneously. It's a thought experiment that raises questions about the fundamental laws of physics and what would happen in such a scenario.
Who would win-an immovable object or an unstoppable force?
Let's see: An immovable object has infinite inertia, so it has an infinite mass. An unstoppable force is probably infinite as well. Were we in the finite domain, we could useNewton's second law that says: F=ma, or a = F/m.Therefore the body would be accelerated by the quotient of the force and mass.Here we go into the speculative domain - if the infinities are equivalent,I will divide them and get a constant, therefore there is a constant acceleration and the unstoppable force wins (the object moves).The part where I cheated was when dividing infinities, which is not a well-defined mathematical operation.I believe we could say this: an unstoppable force would win over an equally immovable object.
What happenes when an unnstoppable object meets a un moveable object?
There would be an endless transfer of energyIsaac Asimov answered this question rather neatly, I thought. I can't remember in which of his many books I read it (it was a long time ago), but the gist of his argument was this: A universe in which there exists such a thing as an irresistible force is, by definition, a universe which cannot also contain an immovable object. And a universe which contains an immovable object cannot, by definition, also contain an irresistible force. So the question is essentially meaningless: either the force is irresistible or the object is immovable, but not both.This was my first introduction to philosophy. It was also my first introduction to the notion that ideas which are actually incoherent, when analysed, can nevertheless be extremely useful metaphors. I can think of no better way to describe some encounters between two-year-olds and their mothers, for example.----The correct setup would be "What would happen if an immovable object were confronted with an unstoppable force." We will have to further define out unstoppable force as having infinite momentum (right?) and the immovable object having infinite inertia (right.) Therefore, our unstoppable force would have an infinite energy (measure this in joules/calories/whatever) and the unstoppable force would be able to absorb infinite energy.There would be an endless transfer of energy.The two would appear as if they are resting, but are actually transferring their infinite energies from one to the other. Equilibrium or a relation would never be established since we're dealing in the infinite regarding energy.
What would happen if an irresistible force met an immovable object?
This scenario is considered a paradox, as an irresistible force cannot exist alongside an immovable object in classical physics. It raises questions about the nature of the concept of an immovable object and an irresistible force.
What would happen if an immovable object got hit by an unstoppable force?
If the unstoppable object was smaller, then it would pierce a hole through the immovable object, not moving the object, and not stopping.
What would happen if an unstoppable object collided with an immobile object?
the particles would split tocreate multiple unstoppable objects
What are the release dates for Broken Toy - 2009 Unstoppable Force Immovable Object 2-8?
Broken Toy - 2009 Unstoppable Force Immovable Object 2-8 was released on: USA: 6 February 2013
What happens when an irresistable force meets an immovable object?
This is an exercise in logic. If an unstoppable force exists, then an immovable object cannot exist, because it would be able to be moved by the unstoppable force, and vice versa. Sideways Logic The unstoppable force does not "stop", the immovable object does not move : the unstoppable force ricochets off the immovable object!
Is there a question that cannot be answered that doesnt have to do with science?
Basic paradoxes are examples of questions that cannot be answered. For example, what happens when an immovable object meets an unstoppable force? Since neither an immovable object nor an unstoppable force exist in reality, there is no way to determine what would happen in this theoretical situation. Source: personal experience
What happens when an immovable object is struck by an unstoppable force?
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
What happens when a unstoppable force meats an immovable object?
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
What happens when an unstopable force meets an immobile object?
It's a paradox known as the "unstoppable force paradox" and it challenges the idea that both an unstoppable force and an immovable object can exist simultaneously. It's a thought experiment that raises questions about the fundamental laws of physics and what would happen in such a scenario.
What is the connection between gunpowder and fireworks?
there is no difference lol thats just like asking what happens when an unstoppable force hits an immovable object - IT TURNS AROUND just because its unstoppable doesnt mean its immovable THE MORE YOU KNOW /god
What will happen if an immovable object collide with an unstoppable object?
the consequential inevitability of two such impossible occurrences could potentially cause a singularity in the instance and or under the assumption that the U.F. will not stop and the I.O. cannot give, the resulting impact could destroy the fabric of space time in the relevance of antimatter vs matter in our dimension opening two simultaneous alternate dimensions. although in theory, two such super powered occurrences cannot exist and alone could destroy our universe let alone together in the same space.
Who would win-an immovable object or an unstoppable force?
Let's see: An immovable object has infinite inertia, so it has an infinite mass. An unstoppable force is probably infinite as well. Were we in the finite domain, we could useNewton's second law that says: F=ma, or a = F/m.Therefore the body would be accelerated by the quotient of the force and mass.Here we go into the speculative domain - if the infinities are equivalent,I will divide them and get a constant, therefore there is a constant acceleration and the unstoppable force wins (the object moves).The part where I cheated was when dividing infinities, which is not a well-defined mathematical operation.I believe we could say this: an unstoppable force would win over an equally immovable object.
What happens when an unstopabul force meat an emovebal object?
Obviously you can't have both an unstoppable force and an immovable object. If the force moves the object, then the object isn't unmovable. If the force doesn't move it, then the force isn't unstoppable.
