the consequential inevitability of two such impossible occurrences could potentially cause a singularity in the instance and or under the assumption that the U.F. will not stop and the I.O. cannot give, the resulting impact could destroy the fabric of space time in the relevance of antimatter vs matter in our dimension opening two simultaneous alternate dimensions. although in theory, two such super powered occurrences cannot exist and alone could destroy our universe let alone together in the same space.
Obviously you can't have both an unstoppable force and an immovable object. If the force moves the object, then the object isn't unmovable. If the force doesn't move it, then the force isn't unstoppable.
If an object is immobile, it means that the net force acting on it is zero. This is in accordance with Newton's First Law of Motion which states that an object at rest will remain at rest unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
An object in space that does not interact with a planet's gravitational field would follow a straight-line path through space, unaffected by the planet's presence. This could happen if the object has sufficient velocity to escape the planet's gravitational pull or if the planet is too far away for its gravity to have a significant effect on the object's trajectory.
Nothing will happen to the object's motion, it will continue along its path.
It will stay at rest.
If the unstoppable object was smaller, then it would pierce a hole through the immovable object, not moving the object, and not stopping.
This scenario poses a paradox because it assumes the existence of two contradictory concepts - an immovable object and an unstoppable force. In reality, both cannot coexist, so the outcome is undefined or illogical. Physics does not provide a definitive answer to this hypothetical situation.
Broken Toy - 2009 Unstoppable Force Immovable Object 2-8 was released on: USA: 6 February 2013
This is an exercise in logic. If an unstoppable force exists, then an immovable object cannot exist, because it would be able to be moved by the unstoppable force, and vice versa. Sideways Logic The unstoppable force does not "stop", the immovable object does not move : the unstoppable force ricochets off the immovable object!
Basic paradoxes are examples of questions that cannot be answered. For example, what happens when an immovable object meets an unstoppable force? Since neither an immovable object nor an unstoppable force exist in reality, there is no way to determine what would happen in this theoretical situation. Source: personal experience
You mean what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object? Well... that is a paradox. In a world where there is an unstoppable force, by definition, there cannot be an immovable object, and vice versa. And let's just say there were such things. When the collide, there will be an infinite transfer of energy. The unstoppable force will have infinite momentum and the immovable object will have infinite inertia. And when they collide, because according to the law of conservation of energy, energy is never created or destroyed, the energy will be constantly exchanged among the two hypothetical objects.
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
It's a paradox known as the "unstoppable force paradox" and it challenges the idea that both an unstoppable force and an immovable object can exist simultaneously. It's a thought experiment that raises questions about the fundamental laws of physics and what would happen in such a scenario.
there is no difference lol thats just like asking what happens when an unstoppable force hits an immovable object - IT TURNS AROUND just because its unstoppable doesnt mean its immovable THE MORE YOU KNOW /god
This scenario presents a paradox, as an unstoppable object would not be able to be stopped by any force, while an immovable object cannot be moved by any force. In reality, such objects cannot coexist within the same universe.
the particles would split tocreate multiple unstoppable objects