The theory would be modified or replaced.
No. It has been established by evidence, and made reliable and correct predictions about what would be found or seen; because of the debate which forced it into focus above most other fields of science, it is more established as a scientific fact and theory than almost anything else. Thus, evolution is highly scientific.
A scientific theory is more likely to be revised or replaced than a scientific law. Theories are based on evidence and can be modified as new evidence or information emerges. Laws, on the other hand, are well-established principles that have withstood extensive testing and are unlikely to change significantly.
The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places
He didn't understand how modifications of species occurred. His theories have stood the test of time when the actual mechanisms were discovered. Further scientific evidence has overwhelmingly proven his basic ideas were correct.
The current model of the atom is a scientific theory. It is a well-established explanation based on experimental evidence and scientific reasoning. The model may evolve as new data or technologies become available.
There was no evidence.
The Correct answer is " Theory "
To develop a scientific law a person must first start off with an experiment or hypothesis. A person will then need evidence to support their theory/hypothesis. If the evidence is sufficient enough then they must provide a conclusion explaining their findings and how they are correct.
The correct steps for the scientific method are: Observation Hypothesis Theory Scientific Law
The correct steps for the scientific method are: Observation Hypothesis Theory Scientific Law
The correct term to use is " there was blood evidence found in the room" if more than one source of evidence i found then the correct term is " there was blood and other evidence found in the room."
The correct scientific notation for 0.00050210 is: 5.021 × 10-4