answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The fact is that the simple model of a nucleus containing neutrons and protons surrounded by electrons is correct.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is the current model of the atom a theory or a fact?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Chemistry

What are the differences between Dalton's model of the atom and Thompson's model of the atom?

Dalton never acknowledged the fact that the atomic structure consisted of protons nor electrons. Dalton's theory suggested:unlike Thomson who came up with the theory of the 'Plum Pudding Model', which consisted of a positive proton with electrons 'scattered' through it, like "...currants in a Christmas pudding..."hope this was somewhat helpful :)Matter is made up of indivisible atoms.All atoms of an element are identical.Atoms are neither created nor destroyed.Atoms of different elements have different weights and chemical properties.Atoms of different elements combine in simple whole numbers to form compounds.


What was JJ Thomson's theory on atoms?

here are some jot notes about thomasons theory: 1894+ +ve sphere with embedded electrons net charge of 0 no protons no neutrons his theory led to the "Plum-Pudding "model


What is the Thomson contribution to the atom model theory?

J J Thomson was the first person to suggest the theory of the atom containing positive and negative particles, and demonstrated the latter which he called electrons. He experimented with cathode ray tubes to show how electron beams were deflected by magnetic forces. He also showed the hydrogen atom has one electron. He worked at Cambridge EnglandHis atomic theory identified that electrons inside an atom could show, meaning that atoms were not invisible.Thomson suggested that the model of an atom as a sphere of positively charged matter with negatively charged electrons surrounding them. He stated that electrons were positioned by electrostatic forces.After the discovery of the electron and proton as subatomic particles J.J. Thomson had started to discover atomic theory that gives complete explanation of atomic structure.According to Thomson protons are embed in the atoms like a water melon and electrons are present in atoms to make the atom electrically neutral.his discovered atomic theory was not able to explain the atomic structure properlyRead more: What_was_JJ_Thomson's_major_contributions_to_the_atomic_theory. Awarded Nobel Prize in 1906.AnswerJ.J Thomson view of atom was on the electrons, like "raisins," are stuck into a lump of protons, like "dough," in a "plum pudding" atom.This is the "plum pudding" atom


Have the models of atoms changed over the years?

The pretty universally accepted model from the time we first began to suspect (with some actual evidence, as opposed to being ancient Greeks pulling theories out a posteriori) that there were such things as atoms was that they were small, indivisible ... well, probably spheres. At least some of them were probably spheres, anyway.Around 1900 it became clear that while "small" was still true, "indivisible" was ... not so much. This lead to several competing theories that came out all about the same time (within a decade or so, anyway; 1902 to 1911): the cubic model, the "plum pudding" model, the "Saturnian" model, and the "Rutherford" model. All of these were attempts to explain the newly-discovered electrons and what exactly they were doing inside atoms.In 1913 Niels Bohr modified the Rutherford model a bit (incorporating some pieces of the Saturnian model as well) and came up with the Bohr model, which proposed that the electrons orbited a concentration of positive charge in the center of the atom in well-defined circular orbits. The Bohr model accounted for the fact that the electrons didn't immediately radiate energy and spiral into the nucleus by proposing that they were confined by ... something ... into specific orbits having characteristic energies. An electron could jump from one orbit to another (provided there was a space open), but only by giving off energy exactly equal to the difference in energy between the two orbits. This accounted for the observed phenomenon that atoms did in fact give off energy of very specific, or quantized, values.There were still problems with the Bohr model, one of which was that there didn't seem to be any particular reason the energy levels should happen to be what they were, so the Bohr model eventually disappeared in favor of the current quantum mechanical model, which describes the electrons as being in eigenstates of the time-dependent Hamiltonian equation, accounting precisely for their energies.


What is the hybridization of the central atom in SbF 3?

Hybridization orbitals are determined by the numbers of electron groups present around an atom. Valence shell theory dictates that with 2 electron groups, the atom is sp hybridized. With 3 election groups, it is sp2, and with 4, it is sp3. Since SF4 has 4 electron groups (each of the 4 single S-F bonds), the S atom is sp3 hybridized. In fact, each of the F atoms is also sp3 hybridized since each has 1 single S-F bond and 3 lone pairs (which each count as an electron group). Therefore, the F has 4 electron groups.

Related questions

True or false The Bohr model of the atom could be correctly applied to only one atom the helium atom?

Niels Bohr in fact based his model on the hydrogen atom. However, I wouldn't say that the Bohr Model can be correctly applied to ANY atom. Whilst it is an excellent approximation it is not truly accurate. Please don't forget that the Bohr Model is just that, a model, and a model is never as accurate as the real thing.


Why can't a fact and a theory be the same thing?

Because a fact is a statement that can be shown to be true by observation or by experiment. And a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning.


What is the name of the modern atom model?

The Bohr Model is the modern name used by scientist for a model of an atom, which is often referred to as the Rutherford-Bohr model due to the fact that Neils Bohr just improved Ernest Rutherfords model.


What are the differences between Dalton's model of the atom and Thompson's model of the atom?

Dalton never acknowledged the fact that the atomic structure consisted of protons nor electrons. Dalton's theory suggested:unlike Thomson who came up with the theory of the 'Plum Pudding Model', which consisted of a positive proton with electrons 'scattered' through it, like "...currants in a Christmas pudding..."hope this was somewhat helpful :)Matter is made up of indivisible atoms.All atoms of an element are identical.Atoms are neither created nor destroyed.Atoms of different elements have different weights and chemical properties.Atoms of different elements combine in simple whole numbers to form compounds.


How were historical models different from our current model?

Well for many years they believed the earth was the centre of the universe and thus everything revolved around the earth as opposed to the earth revolving around the sun. Think of a model where the sun revolved the earth, you can't even comprehend where the sun would go! heliocentrism is the current theory of the solar system, yes it's still a theory because that's how science works. Sciennce doesn't say it's a fact it just has many facts supporting it making it a strong theory.


What was JJ Thomson's theory on atoms?

here are some jot notes about thomasons theory: 1894+ +ve sphere with embedded electrons net charge of 0 no protons no neutrons his theory led to the "Plum-Pudding "model


Is evolution merely a theory?

"Theory" means something much different in the world of science than it does in everyday use. Evolution is an observed fact. The theory around it is just our current understanding of the specific mechanics of it.


Is evolution a law or theory or a hypothesis?

Answer 1A theory. Just as E=Mc2 is the theory of relativity.Answer 2Evolution is both a fact and a theory, although the fact and the theory of evolution are - at least in my book - two different things:The fact of evolution is the observation that lifeforms evolve over time.The theory of evolution is the model that explains how they evolve, and how that applies to our findings in genetics and palaeontology. The theory of evolution incorporates a number of well-tested hypotheses, laws, and facts.


How do the LCAO model explain the fact that He have a bond energy of 1e-3 and average bond length of 50 angstrom?

LCAO linear combination of atomic orbitals is a technique used in molecular orbital theory. He refers to an ATOM helium. Atoms do not have bond energy. The question as asked is meaningless


What is -in theory not in fact?

A "theory" is a scenario of what might be.


What is the opposite word to theory?

The opposite of theory is typically practice. While theory refers to a set of principles or ideas used to explain something, practice involves the actual application or implementation of those principles.


Fact or theory is fire hot?

This is a fact.