Want this question answered?
If there was absolutely no energy in the universe, all matter would be completely still. The temperature would be 0 degrees Kelvin.
Then, according to Noether's Theorem, the laws of nature would change over time. (Nowadays the Law of Conservation of Energy is commonly derived from Noether's Theorem, but it was known for a long time, from experience, that energy was conserved.)
energy doesn't happen, it exists. for energy to happen, energy would have to be an action (verb), but it is a thing (noun).
Momentum would be conserved.
That would be impossible as mass and energy are related.
If there was absolutely no energy in the universe, all matter would be completely still. The temperature would be 0 degrees Kelvin.
It's infinate...
It depends on what you accept as 'being destroyed'. The only thing that is conserved is the matter/energy constant. Matter can be converted into an equivalent amount of energy. Some people would consider this 'being destroyed' but the amount of energy is always the same.
Matter is lost and energy is released.
Not in any foreseeable future would we be able to alter these immense quantities of energy.
Then, according to Noether's Theorem, the laws of nature would change over time. (Nowadays the Law of Conservation of Energy is commonly derived from Noether's Theorem, but it was known for a long time, from experience, that energy was conserved.)
Momentum is conserved in both elastic and inelastic collisions. Mechanical energy is conserved only in elastic collisions. In inelastic collisions, part of the energy is "lost" - usually most of it would be converted to heat, eventually.
If matter were destroyed, then it would not be conserved. "Conservation" means that the amount of mass doesn't change.
This was because of laws of conservation of: momentum, angular momentum, and energy. In certain reactions, these were apparently not conserved; a hypothetical particle would resolve the observed discrepancy.This was because of laws of conservation of: momentum, angular momentum, and energy. In certain reactions, these were apparently not conserved; a hypothetical particle would resolve the observed discrepancy.This was because of laws of conservation of: momentum, angular momentum, and energy. In certain reactions, these were apparently not conserved; a hypothetical particle would resolve the observed discrepancy.This was because of laws of conservation of: momentum, angular momentum, and energy. In certain reactions, these were apparently not conserved; a hypothetical particle would resolve the observed discrepancy.
energy doesn't happen, it exists. for energy to happen, energy would have to be an action (verb), but it is a thing (noun).
Momentum would be conserved.
wat is the answer