if he/she fails to follow compulsory security procedures he/she won't be able to go ahead and to enter the flight
Taking your shoes off in the airport is not optional for safety reasons. If a person refuses, they would be led to a private room and have to consent to a more thorough search of their self and their belongings. Overall, it would cause them more time and stress if they refused to take off their shoes.
If someone refuses to take their shoes off in an airport, it is likely that they could be in serious trouble. They will not likely be allowed to get on a plane, and they may be kicked out of the airport, or even arrested.
If someone refuses to take off his or her shoes in an airport, they would not be allowed past the security checkpoint. The TSA agent would take them into a room to determine the problem.
Because Ferragamo refused to makes shoes for the masons.
No. Assuming that this is concerning a fligt to or from the United States (which is the only country that requires people to remove their shoes before boarding a flight), a person who would refuse to remove their shoes would simply not be permitted to pass through security. If they tried to make a run for it, they would be detained and possibly charged criminally for failing to follow the directions of federal officers.
because he's not wearing shoes
cobblerA cobbler is someone who repairs shoes.
You say, "Ditlhako ke tse." This sentence can be used if you present the shoes to someone or if you show someone the shoes he/she has been looking for.
Someone looking to purchase Tahari shoes may have luck at Macy's or Nordstrom.
In Western Culture, a comment about shoes has no hidden meaning. If someone says they admire one's shoes, it simply means that they think the shoes are attractive.
Your coverage should kick in - if it was a matter of fault, you will be in the driver's shoes unfortunately.
by asking someone to buy them a new pair of shoes